Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poor Are Still Getting Poorer, but Downturn’s Punch Varies, Census Data Show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 01:42 PM
Original message
Poor Are Still Getting Poorer, but Downturn’s Punch Varies, Census Data Show
Source: NY Times

<snip>

The Midwest is battered, but the Northeast escaped with a lighter knock. The incomes of young adults have plunged — but those of older Americans have actually risen. On the whole, immigrants have weathered the storm a bit better than people born here. In rural areas, poverty remained unchanged last year, while in suburbs it reached the highest level since 1967, when the Census Bureau first tracked it.

Yet one old problem has not changed: the poor have rapidly gotten poorer.

<snip>

Perhaps no households have weathered the downturn better than those headed by people 65 and older, whose incomes rose 5.5 percent from 2007 to 2010. By contrast, household income for every other age group fell. Among people ages 15 to 24, it plunged 15.3 percent

<snip>

Household income fell in every region of the country from 2007 to 2010. But it fell much less in the Northeast (3.1 percent) than in the South (6.3 percent), the West (6.7 percent) or the Midwest (8.4 percent). And the Northeast was the only region where household income did not fall last year.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/us/poor-are-still-getting-poorer-but-downturns-punch-varies-census-data-show.html?_r=2



Their guess as to why the 65+ income did so well is pension income with the generation now hitting that age being historically the most prosperous one, thus poorer Americans before them have died and the income is greater in this cohort. We can be sure THAT won't be the case for the generation following them! Ugh, that would be my generation. And it's looking even worse for those that follow my generation.

Look at those data and then tell me that the rich need to have their taxes lowered and all deductions spared. How pathetic those who argue that are. Too bad teabaggers won't bloody well understand all of this and challenge their moronic notions and that of the "leaders" they're touting. Aaaaarrrrrrrgggggghhhhhhh!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think the fact that 65+ people are not as poor has more to do with Social Security
.............much more than pension income. The number of people covered by a defined benefit pension has dropped over the last few decades. Social Security is the major factor keeping 90% of older Americans out of poverty; that's why it must be preserved for coming generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm sure it does.... But the Randians won't be happy until those in poverty don't
own a coffee maker, refrigerator and other pleasantries of life....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. The incomes of the 65+ crowd went up because
they had to go back to work to pay for their meds, help their boomerang kids, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC