Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Patient dies under care of fill-in nurse in Oakland

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
tawadi Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:12 PM
Original message
Patient dies under care of fill-in nurse in Oakland
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

Patient dies under care of fill-in nurse in Oakland

Will Kane,John Wildermuth, Chronicle Staff Writers

Sunday, September 25, 2011

A female patient at an Oakland hospital died early Saturday due to what the hospital described as a "medical error" made while she was under the care of a replacement nurse hired during a labor dispute.

The nurse allegedly gave the woman a fatal dose of medication, said Cynthia Perkins, a spokeswoman for the Oakland Police Department. The nurse, who was not identified, was taken in for questioning by officers.

Police and state medical officials are investigating the death at Alta Bates Summit Medical Center in Oakland, which occurred while most of the hospital's regular nursing staff was locked out after a one-day strike Thursday.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/09/24/MNKA1L97H6.DTL&tsp=1



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. so no patient has ever died under the care of a regular nurse? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tawadi Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Of course that's not the case
It doesn't change the story, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. SCABS LEAVE SCARS.
Edited on Sun Sep-25-11 12:20 PM by Brickbat
Some more disfiguring than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left coaster Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If the nurse had the usual credentials, and was licensed to work, then this scab comment is wrong..
I am an RN in Cali, and I know first hand, that spreading nursing staff too thin, thereby being responsible for too many patients, is when most mistakes happen. They can happen to the regular staff too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Whether the regular staff or the scab staff is spread too thin, a scab is a scab.
If someone says s/he will work under the shitty conditions without complaint that other people are putting their jobs on the line to change, that's scabbing. Crossing the line didn't solve the problem; it only gave this scab a paycheck -- and now, a black mark on his/her record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. How do you know there was no complaint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. SCABS= strike breakers
The fact that Sutter penalized the nurse's with loss of 4 additional days work for a 1 day action pretty much tells the story! It will be interesting to see how Sutter spins this one!

"Sutter Health, the company that operates the medical center in Oakland, hired replacement nurses on five-day contracts and hospital officials said the nurses who went out on the one-day strike Thursday would be locked out until the temporary contracts expire Tuesday."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Sorry, but a scab is a scab...credentials or not nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnie Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. You would rather the hospital try to take care of its patients
with no nurses?

Or do you just want to take away the rights of nurses to have unions, and the right to strike?

Part of nursing unions contracts with hospitals is the agreement by nurses that patient care is upper most. It is upper most even during a strike.

Striking nurses will be replaced and will be allowed safe access to their jobs. Nurses with special skills who cannot be replaced with temps will remain on the job.

Go scratch your butt. That's where the scabs are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is not surprising
I was an agency nurse and it's murder to try to work on a different unit in a different specialty in a different hospital with different protocols every single night. I did it and thrived. Others didn't and they didn't last very long at it.

It's an incredibly high stress thing to try to do, in other words.

Likely the scab nurses were pulled from nursing homes and home care, a completely different variety of nursing, and were pretty lost doing acute care.

The party that is culpable in this death is the hospital that refused to negotiate in good faith with their nurses and provide their patients with the safety that consistent staff ensures. Unfortunately, the person who will be punished is the nurse who was thrown into a situation way beyond her usual job description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Correct answer.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Good points.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Rec this response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamK Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. to be a valid point, I assume the union tests the competency of their workers
Edited on Sun Sep-25-11 01:25 PM by IamK
before they accept their dues? Is this the case? Or are the a nurses "union" just because they pay the union a portion of their check?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
It's not primarily an issue of whether the union nurses individually have a higher level of competency than the nurses who signed on for the replacement period. What is relevant is that the hospital chose to replace on a five day contract to penalize the union nurses for a one day walkout even though it's highly unlikely that the nurses brought in for the short term contract have the same level of competency in the subdisciplines within nursing that the staff nurses have. For example, a critical care nurse can operate in a wide range of hospital departments, but nurses who work in the same unit have considerable experience with the protocols and procedures on that unit and that makes them more valuable than even the per diem floaters, never mind substitute nurses that aren't even familiar with the hospital. An OB nurse is not going to be as effective in oncology ore the ER as a nurse with experience in those units, for example.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. My union puts a heavy emphasis on competency. Slackers,
and fuck-ups will be taken aside by the union steward. If one doesn't carry his weight, others have to pick up the slack. Our job is hard enough without having to cover for some goldbrick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamK Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. the steward must be a busy guy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. No, not really. We busted our humps every day. The only
Edited on Sun Sep-25-11 11:18 PM by alfredo
goldbrick we had was a Republican. I worked so hard, I ruined my body and now I am 100% disabled.

If it hadn't been for the union, I would have been fired when I got injured. I would have lost my house.

BTW, many postal employees are veterans. They hired veterans during times the private sector wanted nothing to do with the veteran.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Posted here very early this morning:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. What I think stands out here is.........
"A female patient at an Oakland hospital died early Saturday due to what the hospital described as a "medical error" made while she was under the care of a replacement nurse hired during a labor dispute."

Would this person be dead if the regular staff were allowed to return to work on Friday?
just askin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tawadi Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Sorry. Didnt see it in GD.
Sometimes I read Late Breaking news and never make it to GD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC