|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
alp227
![]() |
Mon Oct-31-11 08:16 PM Original message |
White House Nominates Two New FCC Commissioners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
russspeakeasy
![]() |
Mon Oct-31-11 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. That should take care of the "jobs problem". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
2. Anybody know their stances on net neutrality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. great question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
3. Dare we hope? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
4. 3+1=4, 3+2=5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jayfish
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. President Obama Nominates New FCC Commissioners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Do you think Obama is on our side? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Yes. Obama's NLRB Appointees Most Pro-Union In Decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 01:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. How about Arnie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 01:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Why pick on Arnie? There has been an abundance of objectionable nominations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
50. Why pick on Arnie? Because both my parents were teachers and I hate the way this administration is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 01:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
31. The same cannot be said of many of Obama's other appointment, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. the two former advisors left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. You are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jayfish
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. My ignorance has been exposed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 01:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
30. Not so fast. Please see Reply 29. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 04:01 AM Response to Reply #9 |
45. Please see Reply 44 too, as Reply 29 fell into a two party trap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Why couldn't it be 3 D progressives? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. That would require a different kind of President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 12:52 AM Response to Reply #13 |
28. See #8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:00 AM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Reply 8 is an incorrect statement of the law, though, and, yes, a Commission of five |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:53 AM Response to Reply #13 |
42. Bingo. See also, Reply 41. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:10 AM Response to Reply #10 |
36. Please see Reply 29. Within those parameters, and subject to the term for which a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:59 AM Response to Reply #10 |
44. Too late to edit my Reply 36, but it fell into a two party trap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Not exactly. The Party of the POTUS is irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 04:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
46. Too late to edit Reply 29, which fell into a two party trap, but please see Reply 44, together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. And Bitch McConnell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. So what? The FCC are tools and a waste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 10:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. what you said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:13 AM Response to Reply #16 |
39. Please see Reply 35, then Reply 29. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 10:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. +100000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:12 AM Response to Reply #27 |
37. If you support union workers, you might want to see Reply 35, then Reply 29. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:02 AM Response to Reply #12 |
35. The composition of a commission like the FCC has a little something to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:56 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. All they really are at the FCC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Tue Nov-01-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Just a stepping stone to being a Comcast executive. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:16 AM Response to Reply #14 |
40. Or vice versa. Revolving door. One of the nominees worked for Verizon as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 11:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Deleted message |
Tsiyu
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yup they pay royalties for maybe a dozen songs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
17. tell it to low power broadcasters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. They can bite mine as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 05:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. my love for radio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 01:47 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Same history here, hiding in the '60s with my little handheld. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 02:13 AM Response to Reply #24 |
38. Here's a link you may love |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 07:47 AM Response to Reply #38 |
47. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steerpike
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
22. The cause of most of our troubles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. when our free form |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 07:49 AM Response to Reply #22 |
48. exactly n\t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Wed Nov-02-11 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
25. and now I hold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 03:41 AM Response to Original message |
41. Now having reviewed the wikis of the Commissioners, I find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unionworks
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #41 |
49. interesting info thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC