|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:27 AM Original message |
Obama: Iran nuclear program poses continued threat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. *yawn* are they buying aluminum tubes now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. This is not the Bush administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Not when he's warmongering like the Bush administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Where is the warmongering? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Do you think this is the first time Obama has addressed this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Iran is violating its IAEA agreements and is developing nuclear weapons capability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 05:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
31. He's not war-mongering, the pro-nukes are in denial. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AverageJoe90
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. no, we don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I think we do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. There is no moral relativism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 12:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. no, they're not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tcaudilllg
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. What it shows is that you can't think for yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:10 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. It does not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tcaudilllg
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:50 AM Response to Reply #19 |
28. It ends at the same point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
26. If you're referring to the troop withdrawal by the end of 2011, it was Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celefin
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 05:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
35. The Obama administration pleaded with the Iraqis to let the US military stay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
57. Prime Minister Maliki got us out, not Obama. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Sounds the same to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. How so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spotbird
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:07 AM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Why indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:09 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. What are you suggesting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberation
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
27. I don't think "benefit of the doubt" means what you think it does... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 07:25 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Here's what I think it means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
54. not when he is peddling the same shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. no one is a nuclear threat to us except Russia and MAD kept them from launching for decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Agreed...we've heard this all before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. No we haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
24. This has everything to do with Iran being one of the "Three Axis of Evil" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
4. Note: lack of jobs ...number one threat to the USA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 10:57 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. So - no foreign policy, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:25 AM Response to Reply #10 |
25. Right ...foreign policy trumps jobs ...like the unemployed really give a shit about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 07:23 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Just saying a president needs to deal with both at the same time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tcaudilllg
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
20. See, the Obamites are going to try to force us into another war! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dover
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
21. Some other pieces to this story - Israel's saber rattling and Iran's new pipeline deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
22. Gee, now where have I heard that before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haikugal
![]() |
Thu Nov-03-11 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
23. The neocons are alive and well....*sigh* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Butch350
![]() |
Fri Nov-04-11 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
34. Start screwing around with Iran... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakeXT
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
36. U.S. Keeps Focus on Sanctions for Iran, Amid Speculation Over Israeli Strike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Booga, booga, booga! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Israel needs to be sanctioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
on point
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Israel and the US here are the aggressors, threatening others with nuclear weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. When did this occur? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I'm not sure if Israel or the US has threatened nuclear attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. I want the world to be free of nuclear weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. So it is wrong for Iran to feel threatened, but ok if it is Israel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Turkey is a NATO country that maintains NATO bases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. nevermind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
on point
![]() |
Mon Nov-07-11 04:49 AM Response to Reply #46 |
61. Iran has NOT been shown to have violated the NPT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Mon Nov-07-11 05:00 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. It hasn't been shown yet (thus the upcoming report). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
on point
![]() |
Tue Nov-08-11 05:18 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Which shows nothing. They are still in compliance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Tue Nov-08-11 05:31 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. You have seen the report? Do share! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. So you think Iran is in fact pursuing a nuclear weapons program? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. I don't know if they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. "All options are on the table" is a threat of nuclear attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AverageJoe90
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:51 PM Response to Reply #41 |
53. I'm afraid you're wrong on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
on point
![]() |
Mon Nov-07-11 02:00 AM Response to Reply #53 |
60. They have not aggressed against anyone so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
on point
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #40 |
58. Read the news. When you threaten another country with 'all options' that is what you are doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Is this LBN ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
56. A one minute video review of who's a nuclear threat to the US: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Sun Nov-06-11 08:23 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Reality is a beautiful thing, too bad many in this thread are ignoring it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Islandlife
![]() |
Tue Nov-08-11 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
65. What we need is a SUPER sanction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC