Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats to offer payroll tax cut compromise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:13 PM
Original message
Democrats to offer payroll tax cut compromise
Source: CNN

Democrats to offer payroll tax cut compromise
By Tom Cohen, CNN
updated 2:21 PM EST, Sun December 4, 2011

Washington (CNN) -- Democrats on Monday will propose a compromise plan to extend the payroll tax cut that includes a "serious" way to pay the more than $200 billion price tag, the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee says.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, will introduce the compromise proposal Monday after the chamber last week voted down competing Democratic and Republican plans, Sen. Kent Conrad told "Fox News Sunday."

The North Dakota Democrat refused to divulge details, saying it was up to Reid to do so, but added it would be "paid for in a way that's credible and serious."

"It will be able to represent a compromise from what was voted on last week," Conrad said, calling it a "serious attempt to move this ball forward."



Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/04/politics/congress-payroll-tax-cut/index.html
Refresh | +11 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hope it's a good one
n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just hope
it's not a white flag or surrrender
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ...as it has been virtually every other time?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Exactly, hope not another cave to the republicans. I really don't know
why they need to compromise when the republicans are already running scared on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. Amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Will the bush tax cuts for billionaires be 'paid for'?
Fuck no. And that argument will not be made, nor will the stunning hypocrisy on display here be brought up. I dread what is in this 'compromise'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. "compromise" from the Obama administration should come with vaseline for We the People
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. oh gods yes -- and a bite down rag.
"Compromise" always seems to involve keeping the Congressional tax rates lower -- along with the other 1%ers....

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
38. The Tax Cuts for billionaires will be extended for 30 years in exchange for 1 yr of payroll tax cuts
That's my guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. I put a gun in my mouth at "...refused to divulge details..."
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. waiting until Friday news dump
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. lmao
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh god, here we go...
Edited on Sun Dec-04-11 04:50 PM by Atman
Republicans get everything they want in exchange for half of what we originally proposed.

I've seen this movie before. Thanks, Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. That's my take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Do you think this is Harry, acting on his own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
47. I don't.
Taking out the public option was never "Harry acting on his own".

The Whitehouse fingerprints are all over this, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
46. Sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach.
:-( :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Democrats hold their ground."
THAT would be a surprise.

Democrats to offer compromise = same ol' shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. No offense, but we are not supposed to use headlines from the Onion in LBN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
45. LOL - oops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
UnrepentantLiberal Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Give them a break.
They need Wall Street cash for their 2012 campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Deficit Commission WAS the compromise.
Now we're compromising on the compromise? Eff that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Who compromised?
Obama has been talking about cutting what he refers to as "entitlements" since before his inauguration. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/15/AR2009011504114.html

Both the failed Cat Food Commission and the Super Committee were inspired by the Sunset Commission proposed by the DLC. http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=254871&kaid=85&subid=65

The biggest tip off is the unprecedent provision in both commissions that Congress could only vot "yea" or "nay" on their reccommendations, no negotiations or amendments. (I guess the DLC feels it is easier to control one appoiniter of Presidential Commissions than to control all Democrats in Congress.)

And, according to John Conyers, it was Obama, not Boehner, not Cantor, not Ryan and not any Republican, who put cuts to Medicare and Social Security on the table during debt ceiling kabuki. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/29/1000282/-Conyers-spills-the-beans-on-Obama-call-for-WH-protests

And let's not forget, it was very loyal Democrat President William Clinton who got caught by a mike offering to help Ryan get cuts by Democrats in the House and Senate. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/05/bill-clinton-to-paul-ryan-on-medicare-election-give-me-a-call/

Oh, and by the way, did you not which members of the Democratic Caucuses did and did not get on that Super Committee?

So, whose compromise was the Super Committee?





Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Um, the democrats and the republicans?
I wasn't suggesting I supported the supercommittee, but don't you find it interesting that now those "automatic cuts" are on the up for reneg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. I've wondered what our side will have to give up
in order to give out a tax cut. Tom Sawyer and a fence!

We're probabaly going to have to give up even more for a one-year unemployment extension that a sizable number of the unemployed won't even benefit from, anyway. The last time, it was a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. the public has seen how tax cuts HAVEN'T worked but made things worse
why keep up a public sham the public isn't buying it anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. It saddens me to tell you this, but I think that there are a lot
of the public still buying this sham....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. cut the payroll taxes that FUND social security?
why are we arguing FOR that?

Its just another way to kill social security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Yep. We've gone 'round the bend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. Thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
43. The current legislation funds SS at pre-cut levels
from general revenue. It does not reduce SS funding. I haven't seen the new proposals but I suspect that they are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. compromise = surrender
Let the damn things expire and then club the cons over the head with it for the next year
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Agree, why do they even have to compromise when the republlicans are
running scared on this thing right now. All polls show favor towards extending the cuts just as all polls show not extending the tax cuts for the rich. Yet, dems get weak in the knees on everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Precisely
Let them expire
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. If it involves Kent Conrad, it's got to be bad.
I'm going to get in trouble for this because he's still a Democrat, but some Democrats like Kent Conrad deserve our opposition and enmity because they're Bad Democrats.

Between Conrad, Ben Nelson and Joe Lieberman I think the next Democratic Senate Caucus will be stronger, even if we lose two of those seats. Improvement by subtraction.

Good riddance to trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. I'm not sure what democrat means anymore. conrad is a
conservative. He would not be a loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. We don't need to move the ball forward.
We need to kneel out the clock by killing the Payroll Tax Cut altogether. If the GOP doesn't want to capitulate, taxes are going up...a matter of fact. We can do nothing and win.

Why does this administration not understand the concept of winning by doing nothing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. full video/transcript of Conrad's appearance on FNS
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
34. Burden of paying FICA was put on shoulders of middle class and poor decades ago -- !!!
Time to reverse that by lowering the FICA rates for middle class and poor

and substantially LIFTING the cap on FICA earnings -- I'd say to a minimum

of $250,000 but should probably be even higher.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. common sense solution (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
39. If it caving into the right forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. That dreded word...'compromise'..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
unionworks Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
42. compromise this
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-05-11 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
44. Daddy came home drunk again, and now we're walking on eggshells,
worried about how bad the beating is going to be this time.

Tht fracking "c" word again. I've come to despise it over the past 3 years, almost as much as I detest the word "bipartisanship".

As long as the status quo is maintained, the beatings and hypocrisy will continue until morale improves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC