|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:17 PM Original message |
Nancy Pelosi provides Newt Gingrich ethics report (1280 pages of the Ethics Committee report) |
Refresh | +147 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Autumn
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nancy, I owe you an apology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AllTooEasy
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Nancy should apologize for stupidly releasing this NOW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Lord Magus
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. This helps Newt get the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Zambero
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Mitt Romney is still very electable. And Newt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Lord Magus
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
40. Romney's "electability" is overrated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EC
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:10 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. It looks to me like Romney has been taking Reagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
izquierdista
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 11:10 PM Response to Reply #50 |
68. Early-onset Alzheimer's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EC
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Actually I think that's Newt. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #69 |
104. BE CAREFUL, NEWT IS AS SLIMEY AS HIS NAMESAKE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. LOOK AT THOSE SHIFTY EYES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. Looks like something you can crush with your feet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #50 |
125. They ALL try to imitate Reagan, even Palin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #40 |
64. I wonder if that is what they thought in Mass. when he ran for govenor? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:02 PM Response to Reply #64 |
126. Two major differences: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #40 |
124. Agree. Romney's proven himself, um, flexible on every major issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
wordpix
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #28 |
47. i dunno---waiting for more ____ to hit the fan re: Bain Capital's offshore tax haven accounts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
snagglepuss
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 10:09 AM Response to Reply #47 |
90. Typo alert. I believe you mean Bane Capital. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:50 AM Response to Reply #47 |
100. Important points also because it could play to traits within the 1%. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
127. I am sure Obama's camp has that at the ready, but, if Rethugs give Romney the nod, you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
immoderate
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 10:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
65. I think Romney is 100% canned and pre-recorded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #65 |
101. Oh, I think his amen -ability is off a little too, with the "Christian" Reich, BTW, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:09 PM Response to Reply #101 |
129. I saw what you did there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
128. Yes, he's very amenable. To change. On. Every. Issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pocoloco
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. Why would they hate Pelosi?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
meow2u3
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:02 AM Response to Reply #43 |
81. They hate Pelosi because she's a woman with power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Lord Magus
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 03:51 AM Response to Reply #43 |
122. Several reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:11 PM Response to Reply #122 |
130. "Pelosi" is not exactly a WASP name. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 04:42 AM Response to Reply #26 |
77. If your premise is true regarding GOP voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MidwestTransplant
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
52. Fully agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
paparush
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
53. "I'm not a member of any organized political party . . I'm a Democrat." - Will Rogers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
55. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:57 AM Response to Reply #55 |
103. Me too. I think the Dems want to run against Mitt and so do I. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 10:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
63. I agree. This is only to satisfy her own ego, not to help us win the election /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:15 PM Response to Reply #63 |
131. I doubt she would inject herself into Obama's Presidential election business without conferring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #24 |
86. 1290 pages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
randome
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:36 AM Response to Reply #24 |
88. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #24 |
99. Perhaps they want to run against Mitt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zbdent
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #99 |
108. Obama vs the architect of Obamacare ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. I can dig it. Debate is good for people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #108 |
132. Meh. That's okay among us chickens. However, in reality, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:54 AM Response to Reply #24 |
102. I disagree, now is the perfect time, strike while the iron is hot and every time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
111. that makes sense to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
stopbush
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
113. Actually, she's smarter than you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:23 PM Response to Reply #113 |
133. This is the Obama campaign. Nancy is not going to stick her nose into Obama's Presidential election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JudyM
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 08:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
121. Absolutely right. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 11:52 AM Response to Reply #24 |
123. I think Obama would prefer to run against Romney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bandit
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. Juicy enough where 395 Representatives voted to sanction him for it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
freshwest
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
58. Just the facts... They're damning enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
panzerfaust
![]() |
Sun Dec-18-11 06:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
143. This trivial political act makes up for not having stood up for democracy when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oh SNAP! The Lady jumps and she scores! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
madmax
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. "Three snaps and a rewind.' ;) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Journeyman
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. "You scoundrel!" Newt cried. "How foul, to tell the truth about me!" . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
freshwest
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
59. Hehe! Nailed that one before I got there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Booster
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. "Whatever truth you read about me are lies." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
134. Remember when Newt said that about quoting him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
stubtoe
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
5. Annnnddd another one bites the dust... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. I don’t know about that. The Republican base only hates it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
GentryDixon
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. You go Nancy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AlbertCat
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. Boy, Ol' Newty really stepped in that one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cstanleytech
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
8. Gingrich + ethics? Did we need a report on his ethics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
135. Nothing tells you more about the Rethug voter's mentality than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
greiner3
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. Great job Nancy; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. When Boehner and Pelosi first met |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Zambero
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
33. His very first nicotine fit perhaps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TexasTowelie
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. LOL. He didn't get his bottle. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:34 AM Response to Reply #37 |
95. He |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
butterfly77
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
46. LOL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
136. LOLOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pam4water
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
11. She should have waited until he was the nominee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Glimmer of Hope
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I know! I think Obama would win in a landslide against Newt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Zambero
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
137. What personal integrity? Supporting Joe McCarthy after almost everyone else had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 06:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Yep. The last thing we want is to make it easier for Mitt to win the primary. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. i think she is trying to help make him the nominee by doing this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Zambero
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Dont call me Shirley
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
12. Was wondering how long it would take the Dems to jump on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Frustratedlady
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
13. And how was The Newt going to retaliate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pam4water
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
139. He'll wait until she has surgery and sneak up on her in post-op while she is still groggy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rtassi
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
14. I guess I don't understand how Newt, could not have known |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
oldhippydude
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 04:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
75. actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thucythucy
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #14 |
91. The same way Herman Cain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
No Elephants
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
138. Apparently, his strategy is to pretend it's dirty pool for her to release info on the public record. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Zorra
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. I think Rep. Pelosi is awesome. Too bad she's not Senate Majority Leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:27 AM Response to Reply #17 |
85. She is about to become Speaker again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jaysunb
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:00 PM Response to Original message |
19. I read it in the WP back then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MarkCharles
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
21. "Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich are having a bit of a fracas" nope, one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
musiclawyer
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. Why do it now? We want him as the opponent, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:44 PM Response to Reply #22 |
30. That would seem to make better sense strategy wise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
musiclawyer
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. The only thing I can muster is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Zambero
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
31. Since Nancy is behind this, Republicans will rally to Newt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:32 AM Response to Reply #22 |
87. Above someone has the theory that it makes him more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Puzzledtraveller
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #22 |
98. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
23. Oooh. That's gotta hurt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
29. RW radio was chuckling that Nancy would never do this and probably has secrets too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 10:48 PM Response to Reply #29 |
67. Nancy's not running for the presidency, fuckwads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
McCamy Taylor
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
38. Wasn't this a matter of public record? We all know he is the only speaker to be censured in office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JI7
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. "we" might know, but not many others , especially indies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sofa king
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 06:48 AM Response to Reply #38 |
78. Yes it was, but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Turbineguy
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
41. Pearls before swine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
marasinghe
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:48 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. too true. the last Repuke with enough IQ to go beyond gawking incomprehensibly at the title page - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KaryninMiami
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
42. Wish she would wait to release these items till AFTER he gets the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. She hasn't and won't release anything. Her aide says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
groundloop
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #42 |
60. As someone else on DU pointed out, we may be better off with Mittens as the nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Puzzledtraveller
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:41 AM Response to Reply #60 |
97. Conservatives are cool to Mittens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
44. The RW talk show idiots have going on and on about how it was illegal and Pelosi was bluffing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FreeBillClinton
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
48. Too long for our nation's journalists to read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Shoe Horn
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
51. So, he used tax exempt organization for political gain, illegally? This is good stuff, I may even... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
unkachuck
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
54. "Gingrich said that would be foul play and promised to retaliate,..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
56. Nice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
freshwest
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
57. Bwahaha! Another epic fail by the Newt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
61. I love her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
62. The Democrats should hope ginrich gets nominated. What she is doing is effectively helping romney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Indepatriot
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 02:15 AM Response to Reply #62 |
73. This will HELP Gingrinch with the Tbaggers, they hate Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Puzzledtraveller
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:39 AM Response to Reply #62 |
96. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigmonkey
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #62 |
115. Sometimes Massachusetts votes for a Republican governor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Crunchy Frog
![]() |
Wed Dec-07-11 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
66. If he hasn't done anything wrong, then he doesn't have anything to hide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:09 AM Response to Original message |
70. When do the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Beartracks
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
71. Only a Republican would claim "facts" comprise a dirty trick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
saras
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
72. It's 1300 pages. It won't be associated with her, but with whoever digs up the juicy parts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
74. Gingrich promised to retaliate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BigBearJohn
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 04:35 AM Response to Original message |
76. Clean up on aisle 4! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #76 |
84. No, over there, on the far right, more to the right, keep going to the right, yeah, way over there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
79. Newtie's Republicon baggage just stinks to high heaven |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
auburngrad82
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
80. Does the report cover all 84 of his violations or just the one he was busted for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Puzzledtraveller
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
82. Newt was/never will be the nominee anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
efhmc
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #82 |
83. You think they have learned that lesson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
89. Why didn't she wait until he got the nomination?? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
92. Republican voters are willfully ignorant most of the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Blue Owl
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
93. Hope she dropped it on his desk with a giant "THUNK" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
94. Rock on Nancy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
patrice
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
106. Good move Nancy. ChurchCoC is going to have a hard time selling this one! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kingofalldems
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
107. Kick this one to the top |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
zbdent
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
109. How is it "foul play" if it's public information? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Scurrilous
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
114. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MerryBlooms
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
116. Beaut. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Shoe Horn
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
117. Fresh Air is doing an IN DEPTH segment on this with Washington Post reporter Karen Tumulty !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
wpelb
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
118. Give me a break |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
efhmc
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. What are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Thu Dec-08-11 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
120. Wow, there's a lot of crap in that thar report!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
140. Kick and would-be rec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sarcasmo
![]() |
Sat Dec-10-11 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
141. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
classysassy
![]() |
Sat Dec-17-11 02:32 AM Response to Original message |
142. What can Nancy tell us we don't already know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
countryjake
![]() |
Tue Dec-20-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
144. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wed Apr 23rd 2025, 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC