|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Newsjock
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 04:35 PM Original message |
Bill seeks to require drug screening for jobless benefits |
Refresh | +26 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
CurtEastPoint
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sigh... same old shit, different day. WTF is wrong w/these Pubs? I think they are mentally ill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RBInMaine
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. You "think"? There is no guesswork to it. They are fucking NUTS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. And who's paying for the thousands of drug screenings? Oh yeah, taxpayers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
iscooterliberally
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. All so their drug screening cronies can make more $$$ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DissedByBush
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 11:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. The Pathology Institute of Middle Georgia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MindPilot
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. Make no mistake this hippie-punching pure and simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Roland99
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. wasn't this found unconstitutional in WI years ago? FL is trying it under pRick Scott |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
russspeakeasy
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 05:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Colbert's sidekick tried to pass Scott a piss cup at one of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KansDem
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. "...ensuring job seekers are at their competitive best" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Blacksheep214
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
8. It's an IQ Test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Leftist Agitator
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 06:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. You'd better watch it, some labs can distinguish synthetic urine from the real thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Blacksheep214
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 07:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Sucks, don't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DocMac
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
9. Even Repubs get high. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. in Kingston's defense, he is an ignorant fool, and possibly a moron. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yeah - the unemployed were FIRED because of drug use - and then they got UI benefits - to do more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Demonaut
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. looking to screen lazy from lazy with a reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Shoe Horn
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. How about drug testing congress first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WhatsNext
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. This could be a windfall for LabCorp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WhatsNext
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
16. Didn't Orrin Hatch start this meme? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bluedigger
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
17. Let's go all out then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
marasinghe
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
18. when they test congressmen for Satanism, by throwing them into the Potomac every Xmas, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SoapBox
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. I'm just thinking of persons in Aerospace or Airlines, over the years that have lost their jobs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
21. Attention, Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
A Simple Game
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Same udder, different teat. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Stevepol
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
24. This already happened in FL did it not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
geomon666
![]() |
Sat Dec-10-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Yup, nothing more than a waste of time and money n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
25. Swell. So medical marijuana patients like me should either starve or go blind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Earth_First
![]() |
Fri Dec-09-11 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
27. Hey Jack, you first! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
geomon666
![]() |
Sat Dec-10-11 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
28. Because this worked so well in Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sarcasmo
![]() |
Sat Dec-10-11 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
30. Drug screening should be required for all politicians at all levels of government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ElMuertoMonkey
![]() |
Mon Dec-12-11 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
31. republican swine is setting his sites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Dec-12-11 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
32. "Those identified as having a high probability of drug use" == ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Apr 22nd 2025, 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC