Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Traditional lightbulbs not going away ... yet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-11 01:51 PM
Original message
Traditional lightbulbs not going away ... yet
Source: CBS News/ Corbett B. Daly

Traditional light bulbs are not going away after all. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill struck a deal late Thursday to at least temporarily reverse earlier plans that would have effectively done away with the incandescent bulb that has been around since the 19th century.

President George W. Bush signed legislation in 2007 to raise efficiency standards on lightbulbs in 2012 to the point that the traditional bulb would have been rendered obsolete.

Speaker John Boehner vowed to overturn the higher efficiency standards when he took control of the House of Representatives in January and the deal struck Thursday follows through on that promise.

Republicans and Democrats added language to a must-pass annual spending bill that would essentially defund the Energy Department's ability to mandate the change, at least through the end of September, when the budget year ends.


Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57344295-503544/traditional-lightbulbs-not-going-away-..-yet/?tag=cbsnewsMainColumnArea
Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank God the Republicans saved the dim bulbs (their natural constituency)!!! (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. But Dim Son was apparently good enough to keep as well.
Dim is as Dim does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-11 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good. I don't like the new ones.
...just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-11 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nor do I. But I do like the environment, they are much more efficient so I already use them
everywhere except for the reading lamp by my bed.

Everyone needs a comfort object.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Me too DR
We stocked up on incandescent bulbs. The light is poor from the new ones and the mercury in them nullifies any environmental benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R! Do you know how hard it is for us with "Recessed Lighting" to find proper
replacements? It's awful. AND...that FUCKING GE closed down their last plant for incandescent bulbs figuring they would move it to Mexico? Now that the Bill allows bulbs to be made here in America...GE and the others have now "broken union contracts, declared they were moving and have GONE AND MOVED.

DISGUSTING...ALL AROUND!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-11 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I use a lot of CFL's
I have seen no savings. None. If anything, they cost more to run because they don't last nearly as long as the hype claims, and they're more expensive to replace. They can't be used at all in rooms like bathrooms or closets, where average usage is well under 15 minutes. They're also dangerous to clean up when they break. And anyone who claims they emit less heat needs to look at the thermometer/clock I have in this room, right underneath a lamp with 2 CFL's. They get hot...VERY hot. They keep me warm in winter, but they're just as horrible as incandescents, in the summer.

I'm all for a new, safe, lower-cost and lower-energy alternative to incandescent bulbs.

But right here and now, CFL's aren't that alternative. Perhaps as technology improves, but it's not here yet. So we need this reprieve from forced CFL's, until technology catches up with our good intentions. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC