snippet:
Since 1982 Cuba has been named a “state sponsor of terrorism” by the State Department and is accused of supporting terrorism by myriad unofficial sources. In contrast to its depiction of the six other countries on the “state sponsor” list, the State Department’s terrorism report makes no charge that Cuba is supporting terrorist operations, lending credence to the view that Cuba’s designation is exaggerated for political reasons. Apart from the debate about the “state sponsor” designation, a more important question is how the United States should address its concerns about Cuba in the context of a global war on terrorism. Officials see no Cuban role in the September 11 attacks and no Cuban connection to groups that carried it out, but Cuban cooperation could strengthen the hemisphere’s counterterrorism efforts. A diplomatic approach to Cuba would draw domestic political criticism and there are no guarantees that it would succeed, but it is an effort the United States should make, as it is doing with Syria, Iran, and others, in the interest of American security.
The State Department’s List
Few question the idea that Cuba, while aligned with the Soviet Union, represented a security threat. Cuba’s military was supplied and trained by the Soviets. Soviet forces were based in Cuba. Cuba advised and supplied Marxist insurgents in Central America and elsewhere. This threat ended in the early 1990’s when the Soviet Union dissolved, world politics shifted, and Cuba entered an economic crisis. In 1998, a U.S. intelligence assessment termed Cuba’s military capability as “residual” and “defensive.” In recent years U.S. government contingency planning for Cuba has centered not the threat of offensive military action but rather on the possibility that political instability in Cuba could cause massive, uncontrolled migration in the Florida straits.
more..........
http://lexingtoninstitute.org/cuba/cubaterrorism.htm