http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-budget1jun01,1,6765603,print.story?coll=la-home-headlinesEclipsed by the furor over foreign policy, Congress' debate over the federal budget has slipped quietly into an impasse that is no garden-variety partisan standoff. It is a battle among Republicans over what their party stands for, analysts say.
At issue is whether this year's budget should put the brakes on the tax-cut drive that has been a hallmark of the Bush presidency and instead put more muscle behind an old Republican orthodoxy: reducing the deficit.
The dispute has kept Congress from completing one of its most basic annual functions -- writing a budget to guide the year's tax and spending decisions. And it has opened an unusually bitter and personal dispute among prominent Republicans.
A small but powerful faction of Senate Republicans has insisted that the fiscal 2005 budget include rules requiring the cost of future tax cuts be offset to neutralize their impact on the deficit. That would mean either cutting spending or raising taxes in other areas. The proposal would strike at the core of President Bush's domestic agenda if he is re-elected by making it much more difficult to cut taxes.
House Republican leaders have vehemently opposed the "pay-as-you-go" requirement as an affront to their party's credo that, when it comes to taxes, the lower the better. They have kept the requirement out of the budget resolution passed by the House -- and openly questioned the loyalty of Republicans who disagree.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
