Actions Speak Louder Than WordsAs I wade through analysts newsletters, internet articles and headlines hot off the press, it seems to me the market noise is at a fever pitch. Market fundamentals don’t seem to have any significance, traditional technical indicators are being distorted by insiders “painting the tape,” and Richard Russell comments in all his years watching the markets he has never seen them so confused. I will attempt to go through some of the issues and cut through some of the garbage being spewed forth from the Wall Street spin machine.
All Eyes on the Employment ReportBond traders have been clearing the decks to get out of the way from a bigger than expected jobs report coming on Friday. The anticipated number is for job creation of 200,000 for May, but do you really think the booming number of new jobs is causing inflation? You are led to believe jobs are causing higher interest rates and ramping inflation from the Bloomberg article titled, “U.S. Treasury Notes Decline; Job Growth May Stoke Inflation.” Since they have already booked an inordinate number of part-time jobs and played statistical magic to remove the cliché, “A jobless recovery,” I can only wonder what they will come up with next. Maybe I’m being too cynical, but I still hear a lot more stories from friends and acquaintances in search of a job rather than stories about people jumping on the payroll.
Hindsight ThoughtsI’ve received a few emails from unhappy investors that took short positions on stocks and implied they lost money because I said I bought some short positions. I was very clear with my disclaimer by stating I was not giving investment advise because I couldn’t possibly know the particular financials of each investor and even more specifically that shorting stocks was not for everybody. To refrain from giving any specifics, I’ll use the S&P 500 as my example. I put on the first positions in early May when the index was around 1,200. Based on insider selling, weak internals (mainly breadth) and technical weakness, my second entry came in mid-May after the index fell below 1,100. The SPX remained below 1,100 for eleven days until last Tuesday when the market caught fire for no apparent reason.
Some suggested there was overt intervention, but I would like to suggest that it was nothing more than a brief short-squeeze to get some traders out of their positions. Obviously if an investor had too large a short position using too much leverage, they got hurt in the squeeze…that was the intended outcome. I still believe we are in a topping pattern that screams of institutional distribution. Market makers wanting to short stocks would rather have you out of their way so they can take your positions prior to the decline. Most all of the upside movement in the last month has happened in three or four days, hardly anything to write home about, but enough to give the big boys more time for distribution. These markets are not kind and trading is not for everyone. I still believe the risk reward relationship favors a move down, but timing is tricky at best. It’s probably a good idea to heed Dan’s advice and just get out of the way for whatever we’re going to get on Friday. When probabilities are roughly the same as a coin-toss, sitting on the sidelines is not a bad place. The bigger problem with being on the sidelines is exercising patience until the right opportunity presents itself.
http://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm