Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taliban Told U.S. It Would Give Up Osama - Middleman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ze_dscherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 09:03 AM
Original message
Taliban Told U.S. It Would Give Up Osama - Middleman
BERLIN (Reuters) - U.S. and Taliban officials met secretly in Frankfurt almost a year before the Sept. 11 attacks to discuss terms for Afghanistan to hand over Osama bin Laden, according to a German television documentary.

But no agreement was reached and no further negotiations took place before the suicide hijackings in 2001.

ZDF television quoted Kabir Mohabbat, an Afghan-American businessman, as saying he tried to broker a deal between the Americans and the purist Islamic Taliban rulers of Afghanistan, who were sheltering bin Laden and his al Qaeda network.

SNIP

A German member of the European Parliament, Elmar Brok, confirmed to Reuters that he had helped Mohabbat in 1999 to establish initial contact with the Americans.

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5346537

Hey, Elmar Brok is a conservative politician from my town!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. They offered many times, but Bush refused because obviously
Edited on Fri Jun-04-04 09:16 AM by leesa
OBL and Al Qaeda were not the reason they invaded Afghanistan. They invaded as they promised they would in July of 2001 because the Taliban refused their pipeline offer. This has been clearly spelled out for a long time now.

This sounds like a RW attempt to blame Clinton once again. Bush was offered bin Laden two or three times after 9-11. They only asked for proof of 9-11 involvement. Bush couldn't provide any proof, still hasn't, and refused the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ze_dscherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Proposals after 9/11 also put down by US
From the article:



In fact, no more talks took place before Sept. 11. But negotiations did resume five days after the attacks, in the Pakistani city of Quetta, ZDF said. This meeting has been reported in U.S. media.

Mohabbat said the Americans pressed in Quetta for bin Laden's handover within 24 hours, but the Taliban were unable to meet that demand.

Within weeks, U.S.-led forces intervened in Afghanistan to drive the Taliban from power and kill, capture or disperse al Qaeda fighters based in Afghan training camps. Bin Laden himself is still at large.

Brok said he had not personally taken part in either reported meeting between the Taliban and the United States but believed there had been a "political decision" not to pursue negotiations after the one in Frankfurt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Exactly. There can be only two reasons for the refusals.
1. OBL was useful.
or
2. OBL was not a threat.

Any more possibilities?

LeT in Pakistan sounds infinitely more dangerous than Al-qaeda because of its association with some of Pakistan's nuclear scientists, but we hear hardly a word about them. Al-Q is a useful propaganda device.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. no "middleman" was necessary as the CIA met OBL in July 2001
http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html

CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July

French report claims terrorist leader stayed in Dubai hospital

Anthony Sampson
Thursday November 1, 2001
The Guardian

Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.

The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere.

Bin Laden is reported to have arrived in Dubai on July 4 from Quetta in Pakistan with his own personal doctor, nurse and four bodyguards, to be treated in the urology department. While there he was visited by several members of his family and Saudi personalities, and the CIA.

The CIA chief was seen in the lift, on his way to see Bin Laden, and later, it is alleged, boasted to friends about his contact. He was recalled to Washington soon afterwards.

Intelligence sources say that another CIA agent was also present; and that Bin Laden was also visited by Prince Turki al Faisal, then head of Saudi intelligence, who had long had links with the Taliban, and Bin Laden. Soon afterwards Turki resigned, and more recently he has publicly attacked him in an open letter: "You are a rotten seed, like the son of Noah".

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. The original ZDF TV story (including video (German, sorry))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'll say what others won't
I have yet to see one shred of evidence that OBL had jack-all to do with 9/11. It looks for all the world as if he has been made a convenient patsy and USA boogeyman #1 simply for the purposes of furthering the agenda of the Bush street gang.

Could we please come down from our collective national freak out after 9/11 and actually investigate the damned crime? It sure would be nice to actually get to the bottom of it and prosecute a few people. Or, as an alternative, we could invade Belize or somebody and kill a few tens of thousands more people just to satisfy the blood-lust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactly
Edited on Sat Jun-05-04 04:35 AM by FDRrocks
We'd be hard pressed to prove it in a court of law. Of course the court of public opinion is fascistic.

But the oft posted facts posted in this title still remain true, and, especially, they undermine the credibility of such books as "Losing Bin Laden". The Bushies wanted to bomb brown people so much they didn't care if they could get thier prime suspect for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Didn't you see the "authentic" home video featuring OBL...
Edited on Sat Jun-05-04 03:47 PM by sfg25
and the cleric which was produced on some soundstage but was conveniently found in some bombed out house in Afghanistan?

That sure disappeared off the radar screen fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Note the timing: During the Florida debacle
They were negotiating with the Clinton Administration, but before it was apparent who was going to be declared the winner for the next term.

Of course the monarchists will tout this as another example of the Clenis dropping the ball, but what it smacks of is this: the Bushies were unconcerned with Terrorism; they wanted to open negotiations about that pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan. Calling off the dogs (including a Naval Task Force) they threw $43M at the Taliban, tried to make a deal, but lost to another bidder because they were too greedy.

Once the Taliban decided to go with the Argentine company, Junior and his marauders girded for war. With a handy provocation like 9-11, they had the momentum to seize Afghanistan for their mercantile designs, and any attempt of the Taliban leaders to cough up Bin Laden after 9-11 would have been conveniently ignored because it wouldn't allow the oil boys to take the country. Taking Bin Laden would also lessen the fear of the American People, a necessary ingredient to the junta's march toward world domination.

When we hear "a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs" (Tom Simons' alleged line) in the national press, then we'll be on to something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. LIHOP Kick!
Or maybe it's a MIHOP kick.

:freak:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC