Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maytag to Cut Salaried Staff, Merge Units (1,100)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 01:11 PM
Original message
Maytag to Cut Salaried Staff, Merge Units (1,100)
http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=businessNews&storyID=5348794

Maytag to Cut Salaried Staff, Merge Units
Fri Jun 4, 2004 12:56 PM ET

ATLANTA (Reuters) - Maytag Corp. (MYG.N: Quote, Profile, Research) on Friday said it will cut 1,100 jobs, or about 20 percent of its salaried work force, and merge its troubled Hoover vacuum unit with other divisions in a major overhaul to compete with lower-cost appliance makers.

The maker of Jenn-Air and Amana appliances also slashed its second-quarter and full-year profit outlooks, citing disappointing sales.

Maytag shares slumped as much as 8.7 percent to $24 on the New York Stock Exchange.

The overhaul, which will consolidate Maytag's floor care and major appliance units with its corporate headquarters, follows years of cost cutting and efforts to turn around Hoover, which has lost profitability and market share as consumers migrated to cheaper vacuums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. They Started Going Downhill When Gordon Jump Died
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Real Lost Jobs Versus Fake Created Jobs By The Government
Whose numbers are you going to trust?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedStateDem Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Massive jobs losses ... in 1998
Surely it is not axiomatic that all jobs lost are high wage-high benefit jobs, and all gains are fake, is it? For example, in the economic boom of the late 1990s, we had this headline from the Bureau of Labor Statistics: "Job losses from mass layoffs rise in 1998" (see text at end of post):

THEREFORE: individual reports of jobs losses in a single company are not proof that an economic recovery is invalid.

AsI have stated elsewhere on this board: we should be glad that the economy is rebounding in time for Kerry to take the reigns. We DO NOT want him inheriting a shoddy economy. Be glad.

RedStateDem

*U.S. employers conducted 15,647 mass layoff actions during 1998, compared with 14,960 in the previous year. The total number of workers involved, based on new claims filed for unemployment insurance benefits, was more than 1.7 million in 1998, up from about 1.5 million in 1997.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hi RedStateDem!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Per BLS, 195,000 Jobs For May Were Fictitiously Created By The Birth/Death
model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ok, so I guess I'm stupid. How can job creation be distorted by
birth/death stats? I know how to distort #'s as good as anyone, but I'm at a loss to figure out how you can distort job creation using b/d.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC