Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Soldier Described White House Interest (in Data From Abu Ghraib)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 11:48 PM
Original message
WP: Soldier Described White House Interest (in Data From Abu Ghraib)
The head of the interrogation center at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq told an Army investigator in February that he understood some of the information being collected from prisoners there had been requested by "White House staff," according to an account of his statement obtained by The Washington Post.

Lt. Col. Steven L. Jordan, an Army reservist who took control of the Joint Interrogation and Debriefing Center on Sept. 17, 2003, said a superior military intelligence officer told him the requested information concerned "any anti-coalition issues, foreign fighters, and terrorist issues."

The Army investigator, Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba, asked Jordan whether it concerned "sensitive issues," and Jordan said, "Very sensitive. Yes, sir," according to the account, which was provided by a government official.

The reference by Jordan to a White House link with the military's scandal-plagued intelligence-gathering effort at the prison was not explored further by Taguba, whose primary goal at that time was to assess the scope of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib. The White House was unable to provide an immediate explanation.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26814-2004Jun9.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perverts go straight to the top?..Gee, who would of thunk it.
Unbelievable!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
32. You know, I initially said I thought this was just a bunch of idiots
at the enlisted and commanding officer level just getting their jollies by taking interrogation too far. My apologies to everyone for being SO WRONG!

I just couldn't believe that the WH would want to get their hands so dirty in this. Turns out they're even more stupid than I could ever have imagined, so I really don't feel too bad about my mistake in judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. another Ka-BOOM from the WaPo today
After Reagan leaves Washington on Friday, BushCo will be hammered all the way out the door. And hopefully straight to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. The rules changed several times, perhaps in response to WH pressure?
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 11:55 PM by daleo
""My direction when it came to the (center) . . . was to set up a structure (of) target folders on individuals," he said, evidently referring to specific detainees. He said he was aware of the "rules of engagement" approved by commanders for interrogations, which have been a topic of controversy. But the rules changed several times, and he did not clarify which set he relied on." (Lt Col Jordan)

On edit - had to change square brackets in the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. I've diaried on this article here.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/6/9/05728/71738#1


It's huge. Now we have a direct link between the White House and the Abu Ghraib atrocities. And Bush was involved in setting the guidelines... having been advised he can torture anyone he wants and no one can stop him.

It's farking huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. Good analysis, grytpype ...
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ruh-roh!! The FratBoy Fuhrer better start looking over his shoulder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Har ! Frat Boy Fuhrer !
Nice coinage. Will use frequently!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Don't you worry about that!
Edited on Wed Jun-09-04 12:56 AM by Oaf Of Office
He has his getaway vehicle ready to go. Move over White Bronco! :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Va va va VOOOOMM!
After Reagan is buried, I expect Kerry and the Dems to light this fire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow. Wow. And Wow again.
Isn't it all so odd? Those pictures are indeed a visual metaphor for the "fruits" of the Bush administration.

"By their fruits shall ye know them".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. The big bore lawyers are warming up their appointment schedules.
Timing, timing, timing.

Swarm, swarm, swarm.

Drip, drip, DRIP, DRIP, FIREHOSE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hmmmm. Let's see:

The Administration asks for and gets memos from lawyers explaining why torture is OK. The Administration develops plans to approve varying degrees of torture. The Administration shows great interest in information from a prison where torture occurs. The Administration then disavows any knowledge of torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
45. Don't forget -- they defined torture and interpreted the laws,
both domestic and international, so that they could get away with it. That was the whole point. So when they say they "didn't approve" or engage in torture, they are basing it on their definitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sounds like they were desperate to "prove" their case that AQ
was in Iraq. The only reason I can surmise (well, after the basic sadistic bent Bush might have on torturing people) is that they wanted to stovepipe intel from prisoners to "prove" their case for invading Iraq.

Bush is losing his mind over Iraq....he's past the point of no return. He has expended his administration's entire focus on Iraq, at the detriment of everything else. Perhaps will see him doing the frog walk yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Frog March!
It's what I LIVE for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Also WMDs
They were probably trying to find the elusive WMDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Maj. Gen. Barbara Fast - who does she report to??
Col. Thomas M. Pappas, the chief military intelligence officer at the prison, said in his statement to Taguba that Jordan was working on a special project for the office of Maj. Gen. Barbara Fast, the top U.S. intelligence official in Iraq. He also described Jordan as "a loner who freelances between military intelligence and military police" officers at the prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. She was promoted by the Busholinis and has been transferred ...
... to Fort Huachuka, Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. Friendly Correction
Hi there, just a thoughtful spelling correction

It's called Fort Huachuca (phonetically pronounced Wha Choo Ka). Those of us in the Military community call it Fort "We Got Cha" because it's so isolated out in the desert of Arizona, i.e., a full hour's drive to Tucson.

I attended my Military Intelligence (MI) Officer Basic Course there way back in the 80s. BTW NO! (pre-emptive defense posture) MI is not always a countradiction in terms. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. Yeah, that was a fatigue-typo.
Edited on Wed Jun-09-04 10:50 AM by TahitiNut
When I was in the Army ('68-'69), troops at Ft. Huachuca got isolated duty pay. Then they moved the gate closer to Tucson to screw the troops. (I was happy to be at Ft. Sam in San Antonio in '68 - with the Hemisfair in town.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. This woman seems to be a linchpin in the torture tragedy ...
her name keeps cropping up yet there doesn't seem to be any impetus to call her to account, very strange, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. It's always bad for democracy to have "freelancers" combining intelligence
and law enforcement in one's military, now WE must DEMAND that the MERCENARIES be PROSECUTED as well. We should see the evidence, make it available on demand to all US citizens 18 and older because OUR taxes went into this conspiracy.

NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Republican partisan political objectives above the interests of the US
This is clearly the Busholini partisans seeking (1) anything that could be portrayed as WMD, (2) an Al-Qaeda/Saddam link of some kind. (3) information regarding the whereabouts of Saddam himself or any of his cronies.

To achieve these objectives, they promulgated faith-based torture. It's the Inquisition yet again.

Absolutely NONE of these objectives are aligned with the priority vital interests of the US, Iraq, the "coalition," or the 140,000 military personnel. They are political objectives only. For the sake of such objectives, the Busholini Regime has created the impetus for crimes against humanity, in violation of the Geneva Conventions and international laws. This has done long-standing harm to this nation, its people, and humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Perfect analysis.
As true modern Republicans their self-interest is their first and only priority. The world be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
36. nice summation
Now it all comes clear.
Monstrous stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. The published reports differ
The rationale used with the personnel involved in the torture, and the point of focus of the interrogations, according to published reports, was thatto save troop lives by getting information on insurgents and especially use of improvised explosive devices. I imagine some of the "high target" detainees may have been interrogated re WMD, etc., but I don't recall any mention of these subjects in various articles.

Then, too, this bunch (Bush&Co.) don't particularly need a rationale to engage in sadism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. Find the live video feed!
I bet the honchos in DC did a circle jerk while watching live video of the atrocities! Find the tapes, and you have meltdown!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. Kick!
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. btt
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
22. Kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. And the walls, come a tumblin'
ala John Cougar Mellenhead (camp)

Bu$h has so many concurrent scandals, it is hard to keep track, no wonder he's crabby these days. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
27. This quote from the article...
During the period in question, the last quarter of 2003, virtually every senior military officer in Iraq, as well as at the Pentagon, was intensely interested in determining who was behind the rising insurgency in Iraq and using that information to squelch it.

...shows the Bushy administration as being completely clueless about who is attacking them. They just did not anticipate a citizen uprising despite being warned of one by US' top generals and lower ranking officers, nor were they militarily prepared for one.

That Bush hasn't been impeached for malfeasant use of our military is a crime in itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #27
44. Who is behind the insurgency? The squatter in Al Gore`s White House.
Of course. Simple question. Now give me a hard one. Oh that`s right this court appointed batch of fascist`s is giving me the hard one.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
28. Bush never visited Abu Ghraib! Stop saying that!
He never visited that prison. Even when he was there at Thanksgiving, just before this story broke, he did not go into the prison and watch torture with his own eyes.

Though he was almost giddy when talking about executing Texas prisoners, he doesn't really like having that kind of power.
And stop saying that he has seen ALL the pictures and videos of the torture. He is far too busy raising campaign dollars to take the time to watch that kind of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #28
47. Right,remember his Pentagon visit



Remember when he visited the Pentagon to take a look at the photos from the prison? I believe they said that he only looked at "eight" pictures. I thought that was odd at the time when everyone else looked at so many.

Now I believe he looked at only eight because he didn't want to be associated with all the rest of the other abuses when he visits the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyending Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
30. I think
my head is going to explode now.

Hang on a second.

BOOM!

Am I reading that the White House is DIRECTLY involved?

F--k me with a roller skate.


What kind of country IS this?

Saw "Tough Crowd" with Collin Quinn on TV last night.
The crowd, the studio audience CHEERED torture.
(I am not kidding, they really did.)

Forgive the repeat, please, but

WHAT KIND OF COUNTRY IS THIS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. It's a Christian Nation
what's wrong wit ya boy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. OUCH!!!!!
"F--k me with a roller skate."

How about a rolling pin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
31. I'm getting impatient. Let's just prosecute the bastards!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
modrepub Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. Do as you say
Mr. Bush and company,

You've continually told us to support our troops. Now it's your turn. Fess up and tell everyone you approved these torture techniques instead of letting our military service personnel "fall on their swords".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
38. A very cowboy kind of affair
That says a lot about the OGA and the contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. For the record I would like to state I was out of the loop at the time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. "the white house was unable to provide an immediate explanation"
I love it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #40
48. Were they too busy looking at St. Ronnie's Journey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
41. Just ... kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
42. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. I do hope folks saw this! Another little kicky-poo!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC