Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Soldier's defense team wants 100 witnesses from Cheney on down for Abu Gra

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 02:20 PM
Original message
Soldier's defense team wants 100 witnesses from Cheney on down for Abu Gra
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04165/331166.stm

Defense attorneys preparing for Pfc. Lynndie England's upcoming hearing on charges she abused detainees at Abu Ghraib prison have compiled a list of 100 potential witnesses stretching from the halls of power in Washington, D.C., to the sand-swept vistas of Iraq.

By putting top government officials like Vice President Dick Cheney on their witness list, England's attorneys are serving notice that in defending their client, they will attempt to put on trial the Bush administration's policies on intelligence gathering from detainees. Like most other military police reservists charged in the abuse scandal, England has claimed military intelligence officers ordered the MPs to "soften up" the detainees prior to interrogations.

However, just because her attorneys want those witnesses doesn't mean that many of them will be on the stand later this month at England's Article 32 hearing in Fort Bragg, N.C. That's because a military investigating officer, the presiding authority at the Article 32 hearing, will decide which witnesses are most relevant.

<snip>

The wished-for witness list, obtained by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, includes, in addition to Cheney, other high-ranking officials such as Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and Defense Undersecretary for Intelligence Stephen Cambone; Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, and other high-ranking Army officers; White House General Counsel Alberto Gonzales; and Justice Department officials.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL
Maybe she can serve some useful function, after all. I know she's a scapegoat, but she's loathsome, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, she's right.
Why should she be singled out for jail time, when she obeyed orders. Orders that were probably coming from civlians, by the way.

Well, good for her. She's going to pay, but why should she be the only one to pay? In particular, I'd like to see indictments for the interrogators of CACI and Titan Corporations.

Right now, they're being sued by a group of 9 Iraqis who were tortured. Expect to see LOTS more of these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorry, but the "just following orders" defense went out . . .
with the Nuremberg trials. When you have photos showing that you obviously ENJOYED what you were doing.

Everyone else should be prosecuted as well, but to try and use the "just following orders" argument ANYWHERE along the line is complete b.s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I wasn't aware they taught torture 1 weekend a month in
National Guard Training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No, that's in the "two weeks a year" part ;)
Seriously, guys, I can't understand why they're not calling the Bush boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Except it leads to the question: "Who gave the orders?..."
"...and who gave the orderers THEIR orders?"-and so forth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think the this whole process will be very interesting.
We will be tallying up the #'s of lies they tell about how they did not authorize torture and Lyndie et al are just deranged redneck ne'er do wells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. How in the world is junior gonna wag the dog in these types of cases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Pvt. England
She is going to have a difficult time of any sort of defense becaause of the Video of her having sexual intercourse with several soldiers in front of detainees. That Video won't be shown at her trial but you can be assured that the judges on the panel have seen it. Of course, this won't be spoken of but it will be in their minds as they hand down the verdict and sentence.

The systematic policy of "abuse", "humiliation" and outright torture is emerging and I have no doubt that documents, more photos, videos and testimony of victems will surface.

The next step will be War Crimes. There are at least 27 cases of detainees that died in various prison facilities maintained by the US Military. These cases are the ones that the Military is attempting desperately to keep in the background.

Having the Military investigate itself is ludricrous!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lucky777 Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Watching her have sex IS torture, imho
She's kind of odd looking; I wouldn't want to be forced to watch her have sex.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC