Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq abuse 'ordered from the top'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:35 AM
Original message
Iraq abuse 'ordered from the top'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3806713.stm

The US commander at the centre of the Iraqi prisoner scandal says she was told to treat detainees like dogs.

Brig Gen Janis Karpinski told the BBC she was being made a "convenient scapegoat" for abuse ordered by others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. DIng...fries are done
That is it.

game over for Rummy....

Violated very US Torture statue he used to justify policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Finally learned that the compassionate conservatives
eat babies, huh Janice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not as long as it Only Gets Reported Overseas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. No coverage in the New YorkTimes and other outlets.
This might as well be buried. The BBC just doesn't have the circulation in the U.S. to make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Wash Post is carrying Reuters version on net - but inside paper???
http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/4829239.html

Accused contractor at Abu Ghraib says guards told to keep prisoners awake
Matt Kelley, Associated Press

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42454-2004Jun15.html

Abu Ghraib General Says Told Prisoners 'Like Dogs'

Reuters
Tuesday, June 15, 2004; 5:56 AM


LONDON (Reuters) - The U.S. general in charge of Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq was told by a military intelligence commander that detainees should be treated like dogs, she said in an interview broadcast on Tuesday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kid_A Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:56 AM
Original message
It's a shame that the facts have an anti-Bush bias...
Now it's up to the American media to make some shit up, just to keep things Fair and Balanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. This was evident from the testimoney of Rummy and Meyers
I remember watching the hearings (had a heck of a time find the transcripts, btw). Anyway, I distinctly remembered either Rummy or Meyers stating that they (Pentagon top) had sent in Miller because he had cleaned up and done some a faboo job at Gitmo. Here's the testimony:
http://www.4law.co.il/rum1.htm
"SESSIONS: Yes, I'd just like to ask you a little bit about it because our time is short.

But as I see back in August of last year, you appointed an assessment team. Is that right? Long before this occurred.

MYERS: Right. As I said in my opening statement, I think we ought to have a lot of confidence in our military leadership, handling the detention situation in Iraq.

It was on 11 August that General Sanchez was worried about detention and interrogation ops, and that resulted in General Ryder going over there and submitting a report.

We, kind of, pushed General Miller on him in August of '03, to look -- because he was so successful in Guantanamo, look at our detention operations to make sure we're doing it right. And that we're also -- that it's well-connected, that the intel is getting to the analysts and so forth, so we can win this...

I don't know about Karpinski being a scapegoat. I'm still holding judgement on her depth of culpability and knowledge. Her statements aren't beginning to wash with me. In one interview with claiming she had no idea she tried supporting the claim with the assertion that not even other soldiers eating and sleeping with the accused abusers knew what was going on. Now, we've come to learn that others did know and complained about it...to no avail, but they did know and said something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redhead488 Donating Member (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. She is culpable
The soldiers who carried out the torture and humiliation were under HER command. If they took orders from someone NOT in their chain of command, she is to blame for that as well: poor training and oversight. If she had been doing her damn job, she might have been able to prevent some of this. Where are her official protests up her chain of command at not having total control of the jail? Where are her statements to superiors that she disagreed with the amount of control in HER prison being granted to military intelligence? At the VERY least she should have been courtmartialed for dereliction of duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Duplicate topic, please discuss here, thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC