Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Says Iraq Posed Threat Because of Terror Link (Justified War)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:51 PM
Original message
Bush Says Iraq Posed Threat Because of Terror Link (Justified War)
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=ahY4hRYnKbbw&refer=top_world_news

June 17 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush said ``numerous contacts'' between Iraq and the al-Qaeda terrorist network justified the U.S.-led war on Saddam Hussein's regime.

``There was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al- Qaeda,'' Bush told reporters after meeting with his Cabinet at the White House. ``This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al-Qaeda. We did say there were numerous contacts between Saddam and al-Qaeda.''

A panel investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks reported yesterday that meetings or contacts between the former Iraqi dictator and al-Qaeda terrorist leader Osama bin Laden didn't lead to a collaborative relationship. There's ``no credible evidence that Iraq and al-Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States,'' the panel said.

The Iraq war, with its mounting casualties caused by insurgents opposed to the U.S. occupation and a scandal over the abuse of Iraqi prisoners, is losing public support less than five months before Bush faces re-election. A Los Angeles Times poll June 5-8 found 53 percent of those surveyed said going to war wasn't worth the cost, while 43 percent said it was. The poll surveyed 1,230 registered voters nationwide.

...more...

You know how to tell *Co is lying? His lips are moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. They have decided on their talking points for all Repubs.
I started hearing this line yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Contacts? Like what? Phone calls? Letters?
What exactly are "contacts"? Are a few phone calls and letters worthy of a cluster bomb nowadays? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. sounds more like "contact-related program activities" to me
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just keep doin' the broken record thingy, George.
People aren't as stupid as you and yours may believe.

We live in the information age. We are better educated than ever before.

That's where you arrogant neocons missed the freakin' boat.

You underestimated the true strength and wherewithall of the American people.

Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. what a poor hand to pLay
i'd caLL it a bLuff, but it's more of a "crying caLL"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. In His Dreams
Nowhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey Dumya, Prove it.. Or just say what the nexus was - the Reagan admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. What an ass
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arbustosux Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Didn't half of the Bush administration have "contacts" with Sadam?
I think that justifies attacking them :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Okay, he's stupider than I thought
So far, I'd only heard "links between Iraq and Al Qaeda." You could make a really lame claim that Ansar Al Islam was located in Iraq and was therefore a link to the country. But if he's saying "links between Saddam and Al Qaeda," he's outright lying. The murderous bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. here it is in virtual print
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200406/s1134536.htm

Bush insists Saddam-Al Qaeda links exist

United States President George W Bush has insisted Saddam Hussein had a relationship with Al Qaeda, contradicting an independent commission's report that there is no evidence of collaboration between Iraq and Osama bin Laden's militant network.

After meeting with Cabinet members, Mr Bush forcefully disputed findings from the commission investigating the September 11 terrorist attacks which had called into question one of his main justifications for the US war on Iraq.

"The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and Al Qaeda is because there was a relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda," he said.

"This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

"We did say there were numerous contacts between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda. There were numerous contacts between the two."

...more...

And GeeWhiz Gollywillackers! That's a damn good reason for a war! I bet the 'murcans will give up to 10.. no 20,000 of their kids just for that! And we can take out a bunch of them little brown people while we're at it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Nice Freudian slip!
"The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and Al Qaeda is because there was a relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda," he said.

Note how he leaves out "Saddam" in the 'explanation'. Very telling, don't you think?

It should read, "The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and Al Qaeda is because there was a relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda, even though this relationship was outside the reach of Hussein thanks to the no-fly zone. I just expect my fellow Amerkuns to be too stupid to notice my verbal-type bullshittin'."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. And, of course, Ansar al-Islam's location? Northern Iraq.
In the region not controlled by Hussein, thanks to the (non-UN-sanctioned) US/UK "no fly zone".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. I just noted the "talking points" by Cheney on CNBC.
They are attempting to do that "propagandizing", again. But, this time,...I am actually enjoying their broken record bullsh*t. They are digging themselves deeper and deeper into the "BIG LIE"!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TOhioLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. what about this little tidbit?
from the memory hole:

http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/no-saddam-qaeda.htm

<snip>
>>> During one of his rare press conferences, President Bush admitted something which completely contradicts what we've been hearing from him, most other politicians, and the mainstream media. Not surprisingly, the media have completely ignored this; I couldn't find a single article that mentions it in any news source, domestic or foreign.

The occasion was a press conference with UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, which took place in the White House on 31 January 2003. Here's the key portion:


One question for you both. Do you believe that there is a link between Saddam Hussein, a direct link, and the men who attacked on September the 11th?

THE PRESIDENT: I can't make that claim.

THE PRIME MINISTER: That answers your question.

<snip>

What about that Bush-Cheney-Powell-Rice-Rumsfeld?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Where's
the qoute of him saying there are no links to Al Qaida? Flip flop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. There's a quote in my sigline
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Painted into a corner.
These arrogant war profiteering, war criminal have painted themselves into a corner and now must stick with their lies. What is needed now and I strongly suspect is coming from the Pentagon &/or the CIA is documentation proving that the Pres. & VP approved of torture. The V. Plame Outing debacle will pale to the documentation of BushCo's War Crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. Damn... i guess since i talked to that chick at work twice in the hall
we are married ... according to George * .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. seems Bush is gonna stick with his "core" defense. it's flimsy, to be kind
but it is now all he's got.....every other sideline, smoke and mirror ruse about this war has been shown for what they were. smoke and mirrors. Even, "isn't the world better off without Saddam?" is getting thin on the home front. Bushco returns to the original ruse and will play it out, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Staying the Course
Shrub reminds me of Yosemite Sam. Six guns blazing, he's run a few feet off the cliff into midair. He just hasn't quite realized it yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh yeah, there were "contacts"

According to the 9/11 commission, Al-Quida apparently had a couple
of meetings with some Iraqi intelligence officer, and, according to
the commission, they asked if Iraq would allow them to set up a
training camp in Iraq (many years before 9/11). Apparently the
Iraqis either turned them down or didn't respond (Don't call us, we'll
call you).

That's a reason to go to war!

I suspect that there are a half dozen countries in the middle east
and Africa that had the same request made (Iran, Libya, Egypt, Yemen,
Syria, possibly even Jordan and Saudi Arabia). Plus others that
we haven't heard about too. So, does that provide a "link"?
Is that sufficient reason to ascribe blame and launch a war that
will cost us over 1000 American dead, 200 Billion plus, AND make us
one of the most hated nations on the planet... not to mention
motivating perhaps 100,000+ new recruits for the terrorists?

I'm underwhelmed.

Much like the one or two old Sarin gas warheads that we MAY
have found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. I am so sick of this
fuckwad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. Who had more contacts with al Qaeda in the last 20 years ....
... Saddam and the Baathists or the Reagan/Bush/Cheney/Rumsfield cabal??? I'd be willing to bet it was Reagan/Bush/Cheney/Rumsfield ... by an order of magnitude at least.

These people are more evil and corrupt than the Five Families. :puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. I think he has been walking in the poppy fields. This proves that
these monsters think they can say anything. Of course the sheeple do believe it, but I am counting on the independents to get really riled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
26. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC