Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Airports Can Go Back to Private Screeners Next Summer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
hightime Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:26 PM
Original message
Airports Can Go Back to Private Screeners Next Summer
WASHINGTON (AP) - Airports that want to replace government security screeners with privately employed workers can do so by early next summer, the Bush administration told Congress on Thursday.

Thomas Blank, assistant administrator at the Transportation Security Administration, told the Senate aviation subcommittee that airports will have three options: remain in the federal system, use a private contractor to hire and train screeners, or run the screening themselves. They can apply for a change in November.

Airport groups estimate between 20 and 100 of the 445 commercial airports under TSA supervision will choose to opt out of the current system. Those that do will be able to leave the federal system starting early next summer, Black said, though their security systems still will be overseen by the TSA.

Smaller airports are likely to be most interested in running their own screening operations because it would be simpler. They would avoid red tape from Washington while they could do their own hiring and training.

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGB5T1M6VVD.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. All right!
Nothing like hiring private people to do such an important job. I'm sure the privatization of this industry will work well. Yep. Confident, I am. Dear God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. surprised they don't want to do it now so we can have
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 02:31 PM by crozet4clark
a repeat of 9-11 before the election?

WTF? Didn't we just spend alot of money to move away from the private system?? Does anybody in Bu$hCo know how to manage ANYTHING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. You're right.
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 06:58 PM by freeforall
This was one of the biggest issues just after 9/11, and the government stepped in and said, "No private screening. Homeland Security, blah, blah, blah...."

I think that the US will be totally screwed if * gets re-selected. This guy couldn't make up his mind to save his life. I am astonished that there is still so much support for this idiot, and sick of hearing one scandal after another.

I really, really hope you guys will get this A-hole out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olacan Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am
in favor of that it should be the airlines responsibility to provide the screening. I just hope this means that the size of the Federal govt. payroll will shrink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:41 PM
Original message
god yes ...i agree...
anything we can do to shrink the size of the fed gov payroll is imperative. maybe we could try doing away with all those nasty clean air and water regs and the resultant beauracracy. and the bank regs. and the auto safety regs. and the DOE. and the energy dept. and etc.

god yes. gotta shrink that fed payroll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. And the Secret Service, the FBI, Homeland Security and the military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Uh huh
The airlines ran the security prior to 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Airlines responsibility? Give me a break!
Like they have all this extra cash to provide a high level of security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. nope same pay less people....they need the money for their
raises in November right after the election... every year they get them...no matter what is happening in the economy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. pssst that is the reason that 9/11 wasn't prevented in the first place
Just in case we forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sure, why not! They'll be done with their October surprise, might as
well give it back. Was 9-11 really the fault of airport security at the time? Seems to me it went a lot further than just missing the opportunity to nab some folks with box cutters. Do you really feel safer since the government took over the job and has successful confiscated thousands of toe nail clippers? :eyes:

Ever stop to think that those private firms might thwart the October surprise? :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossfish Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. So does Halliburton now have an airport security division?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Bingo! I just bet we've got a winner
here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. In fact, go HERE
http://www.halliburton.com/infra/sl0060.jsp

"They have decades of experience in aviation facility planning, airport operations, design and construction management of airfields, terminals, fuelling systems and security systems."

lots lots more, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. outraged kick --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC