In order to maintain this image of superiority Americans are content to be the only people on the planet banned by their own government from traveling to the #1 tourist destination in the Caribbean but feel they have the moral authority to criticize freedom and democracy and rights in Cuba and elsewhere.
Ha, who in the world do Americans think they’re fooling? Obviously not the people in Paraguay for one!
How many more deaths financed by US taxpayers will it take before Americans stop living the lie and take off the blinders and act responsibly especially in their own hemisphere?
History shows that the people of Cuba fought for many years for their independence, they will continue to defend their sovereignty with or without Castro. The only way Americans could take over the island as so many brainwashed and bushwhacked morons dream of would be to nuke the place.
There are a lot of lessons Americans should, could and ought to have learned from Cuba by now but so long as Americans still prefer to live in splendid embargoed isolation they have no credibility or moral authority. Anyone spouting the US government or Florida “exile” line in this day and age is a bigoted hypocrite to the core whether they realize it or not.
---
"Let’s talk about democracy. If Cuba had free elections tomorrow, do you think the CIA would not be financing the opposition like they did in Nicaragua? What are you talking about?" But it’s an argument that (Oliver) Stone believes most of his countrymen have failed to grasp. "Americans ask the wrong questions," he argues. "Castro, when are you going to hold elections? Well what does an election mean to a kid in Honduras? He does have elections, actually. The elections mean about as much as the elections in f***ing Honduras. It’s so disgusting, so rhetorical. I have been to a hell of a lot of South American and Central American countries. God forbid, I’d rather be a Cuban any day than a Honduran. That s***hole in Honduras: growing up, you’re going to die from bad water before you’re two. It’s awful up there, and in Mexico too. There’s no comparison with Cuba."
So was there nothing in Cuban life that Stone protested to Castro about during their three days? "Frankly, I told him I could never stand to be on a block where everybody was telling me what I’m doing. I believe in free enterprise. I believe in capitalism within a certain ceiling. I believe in the ability to make a living freely, perhaps because I’m accustomed to it as an American. But Fidel’s arguments are not necessarily in opposition to mine. He believed in a socialist model, I don’t think he necessarily believed in a Communist model. I believe he became indebted to the Soviet Union mostly because of American intransigence to him, most specifically via Richard Nixon, who was the biggest liar of American history. So why we believe Richard Nixon and not Fidel Castro I don’t know."
- When Castro got stoned, Scotland on Sunday, Sun 17 Aug 2003
-
http://www.scotlandonsunday.com/thereview.cfm?id=901922003--
The Cuban revolution does repress those who disagree. I think this is a serious issue. But this should not obscure the fact that it has real enemies who have attacked it violently for forty-four plus years. But to understand it, one must place it inside its historical context…
… … Latin Americans never disobeyed the United States before the Cuban revolution. And even Castro's ideological foes acknowledge their debt to him for standing up to Uncle Sam.
The revolution ended in the late 1980s when the Soviet Union collapsed. Cuba no longer had the resources to change itself or the world. Tourism and dollarization have introduced dubious values. A black market thrives. Where is Cuba going? Where is Peru or Mexico going? Most third world country without major strategic resources don't possess economic road maps. Cubans at least have the advantages of institutional equality and services sorely lacking in most of the third world- thanks to their Revolution
- The Cuban Revolution 50 Years Later, Saul Landau, August 16, 2003
http://www.counterpunch.org/landau08162003.html--
Who are the Cuban 'dissidents'?
… Being a Cuban revolutionary all of my life, having fought in Angola against the South African invasion and being, at the present time, incarcerated in a U.S. federal prison for protecting the Cuban people from the terrorist actions supported, encouraged and silenced by the United States government, I hope that--if being progressive is still to fight for a better world--I might be entitled to the benefit of being considered a progressive person.
So, when I opened a magazine called precisely The Progressive and read an ad by the Campaign for Peace and Democracy requesting signatures in order to condemn Cuba for its alleged "repression of dissidents," I was, at best, in disbelief.
I can't imagine that somebody can consider himself a progressive person and then take at its word the endemic slandering and lies of the U.S. media in regards to Cuba. It would only take a little bit of intellectual honesty and some research to discover that the money to pay the "dissidents" is appropriated, overtly and openly, by the U.S. authorities to be distributed through entities like NED and USAID among whomever, on the island, decides to make a living as a dissident.
Who gives any moral authority to the American government to create a paid opposition in Cuba? What international principle of law applies to this behavior? Since when is it a role of a U.S. diplomat to tour the island organizing the "opposition" and giving out money?... …
http://www.workers.org/ww/2003/renelet0821.php