Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blast Hits Baghdad Water Supply; U.S. Soldiers Shot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 05:19 AM
Original message
Blast Hits Baghdad Water Supply; U.S. Soldiers Shot
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A major water pipeline in northern Baghdad was breached on Sunday, flooding nearby streets and cutting off the supply to parts of the Iraqi capital, after what locals said was a bomb attack.

...

In the latest ambush in Baghdad, two U.S. soldiers were shot and wounded as they left a restaurant on Saturday, the military said. Both were in a stable condition in hospital.


Iraqi police and security guards have also come under attack from anti-U.S. fighters who accuse them of collaborating with occupying troops.

...


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030817/wl_nm/iraq_dc&cid=574&ncid=1478
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. 'Tis been relative quiet the last few dalys
unless Rummy got the lid on things going on in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. this might be the reason; btw 3 days, three pipelines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. They don't have to "beat us" to win..
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 05:49 AM by SoCalDem
Small bands of guerrilla insurgents , under cover of darkness, blowing up stuff here and there will do the trick..

Disruption of what little services that there are will destroy any remaining morale..

If our people spend all their time guarding water pipes and trying to repair breaches, all the while , dodging hostile fire, it will not take long for the whole house of cards to fall.:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Think back to say Fr. WW2
Germany took over half the country and put in 'their' people but the underground never gave in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You don't even have to go back that far-
Think Afghanistan and the Soviets.

The guys in the Kremlin have to be getting a chuckle out of Georgie's Iraqi adventure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Oh, yes, the Russians are loving this
They see Afghanistan written all over this. They know the longer we're there, the worse for us. Meanwhile, the Russians sit back and gleefully rub their little hands together.

Wonder if the Russians will start running guns and weapons to the Iraqis, like we did with the Afghanis? China, too. Just send them through Iran and Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. they don't need to....
sell weapons to a third party.....
thats plausible deniability..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dan Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. Laughter...
Speaking of Afghanistan..thats a hell hole too. We own the day they own the night...

Our military can & will win all the battles; but I suspect that we are going to lose the war in both places....or at least in Afghanistan, because I forgot *Idiot says we've already won in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Saboteurs blew a hole in a giant Baghdad water main
Saboteurs blew a hole in a giant Baghdad water main, forcing engineers to cut off water to the capital on Sunday.

Meanwhile, two ferocious blazes raged out of control on Sunday along the pipeline that exports Iraq's oil to the north.

The twin acts of sabotage are complicating efforts to bring stability to war-torn Iraq.

The fires on the 950km pipeline stretching from northern Kirkuk to Turkey, 200km northeast of Baghdad, were within kilometers of each other.

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraq/0,,2-10-1460_1403460,00.html

http://darker0darker.tripod.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Was this the pipeline...
that was re-opened recently?

Oh, well...more work for Halliburton to tax us "Real 'Muricans"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Get the US Troops OUT of there
NOW...this place is going to get worse and worse...
DEMS better start yelling for the UN to get involved...this is escalating into Vietnam redux ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bfusco Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. and it will continue to get worse
Shrub won't do this until things spiral out of control and then it will be probably be too late. Surrending the operation to the UN means they can't continue to pass out fat contracts to their buddies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Smart guerillas will target the corporate guys.
Make even the highest danger pay not worth it to civilian workers.

Neither Bush nor Halliburton give a shit how many soldiers die, but skilled oilfield workers?

At some point they will figure that out.

If it becomes too expensive to do business, the corporations will call for the UN intervention and make the calls necessary to bribe those guys instead of the Bushco boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Look, you guys....
Let's not be hoping more of our boys get killed. I was totally and completely against this war, but as far as I'm concerned we need to stay there until we finish the job and fix Iraq's "infrastructure." Bush needs to pay BIG TIME for doing this, but he's not paying when our soldiers are getting killed. The damage has already been done, for him. It's quite enough that he lied and so many have died already.
Let's all just pray that we can get this thing finished and get the hell out of there as quickly as we can.
I do understand where you're coming from though. I'm extremely angry about this.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Come on, nobody is wishing that
I think there's only one solution, and that's to attempt to deal with the UN -- probably on their terms -- and get US troops out of there.

WE CANNOT FIX THIS ALONE NO MATTER HOW LONG WE STAY!

That would be the type of thinking that kept us in Vietnam a decade longer than we should have been.

We DO need to make recompense, but it's going to have to be primarily financial in nature. And it's going to cost A LOT.

And none of this is going to happen while Bush is president. While he's president, there's going to be nothing but death over there. I just don't see any other possible outcomes. He's NOT going to admit he f*cked up. He CAN'T.

(ps. the parable of the Scorpion and the Frog, as retold in 'The Crying Game' comes to mind).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Yeah, we KNEW he was a scorpion....
Anyway, I totally agree with you. We desperately need to throw him out, and get the UN involved. Getting the UN in there just makes too MUCH sense, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Bush and his cronies don't want to give up the money
They decided not to go to the UN last week, because they were concerned about renegotiation of their corporate contracts, particularly the oil-related ones.

The parable of the chimp with his hand stuck in the cookie jar because he won't let go of the cookie inside is probably most appropriate on this count.

There isn't a 'job to finish' as I hear so often, but only a crime to be held accountable for (violation of the UN charter in Bush's case -- Armed Robbery if you or I did the same thing).




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. To use another allegory
...we can burn the place down then leave, or we can burn it down and help them rebuild it (whether they like it or not).
But YES agreed all the way except for there not being a job to finish part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Bush isn't capable of rebuilding Iraq in any fashion
It's that 'scorpion nature' again.

Look at Afghanistan for example of his 'nation building' abilities...

The longer we stay, the more damage will be done. There is no beneficial component.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. htuttle you are absolutely correct!...turn Iraq over to UN NOW!
bring our troops HOME NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
45. Well, after all,
he did say "He wouldn't do any nation building". Didn't say anything about not doing any nation destroying, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnabelLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. "Mine mine mine mine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #18
50. surround a scorpion with fire
and it will sting itself to death.

How do we make * sting himself to death?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. It's TWO years in Afganistan...OUR soldiers are still being KILLED
in Afganistan...the only area under our control is part of the capital city, the drug crop is the BIGGEST economic boost to the country, the warlords are still running the country, osama is still around, the taliban is doing better than ever...

and for this TWO YEAR mess, WE the taxpayers are paying $ ONE BILLION DOLLARS a month....I wonder how many school teacher that would pay for ?...or how many of OUR seniors could have life-saving medications ?....or how much decent housing for OUR homeless Veterans could be built for $ ONE BILLION DOLLARS a month...

and the 'cheap-labor conservatives' just LOVE the shrub for this spectacular failure....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Who in the world are you talking to?
"Let's not be hoping more of our boys get killed."!!!!!

Tell me *specifically* anyone on this thread has expressed this sentiment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Well...
Aquart's suggestions for the guerillas seemed to be getting there.
I'm not trying to get down on anybody, I'm just saying be careful. In being against the war it's easy to fall into that kind of trap. I feel rather torn, myself, between my sense of justice and, oddly, what I feel to be my better side, which just wants the violence to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #16
49. Aquart stated that the guerillas
were going to figure out that killing skilled civilian laborers would be a better way to beat us than killing our soldiers. AT NO TIME did he suggest that US troops dying was a good thing. Complete supposition on your part. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Your Sentiments Are Admirable, Mr. Loony
Edited on Sun Aug-17-03 12:28 PM by The Magistrate
Nonetheless, the criminals of the '00 Coup who contrived this cup must be made to drain it to the bitterest dregs of soldier's blood. The continuing deaths of U.S. soldiers are the visible sign of the reckless incompetence and colossal misjudgements this policy consists in: they are necessary to drive home to the people truth of this. Staying is as foolish as entering was. No mistake is corrected by perseverance in the error, but only compounded by it. These soldiers die for arrogance of rulers, profit of cronies, and in direct consequence of lies to the people. Should these deaths result in the cleansing of our government from these reptiles, they will certainly be in our national interest: indeed, in no other way will they be.

"LET'S GO GET THOSE BUSH BASTARDS!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. "Let's not be hoping more of our boys get killed."??????
Have you lost your mind? Most the people on this board didn't want them over there to begin with! And the people who say we have to stay until the job is finished, whatever the hell that means, are wrong. If we were wrong to go in, what makes it right to stay now? And tell me, what does finishing the job mean to you? What is your exit strategy?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. We need to stay because...
...the worst thing we could possibly do is invade and then just leave while their country is broken. It's bad for us, and bad for them. Invading them was bad enough, but leaving would just compound both their and our problems. Now that we're there we've got to make sure, somehow (e.g. through the UN) that this thing gets finished properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. And what if the Iraqi's don't want the UN to occupy their country?
Or anyone else for that matter? Have you even considered that idea?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Hear Hear, My Friend!
As a matter of right and wrong, we should cut and run quick as we can, like a burglar discovered in a parlor.

As a question of real-politik, the longer this mess conrinues, the worse it will be for the reactionaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I thought you wanted us to stay...
....so more of our boys would get killed and Bush would be held responsible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. When Your Enemy Is Digging Himself A Hole, Sir
Handing him a shovel is the soundest policy.

Desire has nothing to do with any of this, and these reptiles will persevere in their chosen course regardless of what any say, here or elsewhere: better it fail as miserably as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. They won't....
I'm pretty sure they're not going to be too pleased having anybody in there, no matter who it is. However, a good part of the population already "understands" why we're in there right now. And the UN would certainly be a heckuva lot more legitimate than just the US and Brit etc. soldiers. It wouldn't be perfect, but the violence would be less than it is now.
I think it is also important for the *US* to get help from the UN, for many reasons. The world knows that if we really care about finishing the job, we'll get the UN involved. If we don't, we look really bad.
Not to mention that we just need help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Shiite rule.....
US leaves and most of Iraq will become a Shiite republic with tribal and clan divisions! Bushco can't stomach teh idea. The BFEE will destroy Iraq before allowing ayatollah rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. That's a big problem...
...and I'm not sure how we're going to get around it (without being another Saddam).
I don't think there IS a way of getting around it. I guess that's what I'm saying.
But, I do know that we can't just leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Actually the problem is people who will not admit that we were wrong...
...to invade another sovereign nation under false pretenses, and then continue to insist that we must stay because "we just can't leave now". Wish I had a nickel for every time I heard someone say "we just can't leave now" during the Vietnam fiasco. That is the truth no matter how you cut it.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. It's llittle more than disguised imperialism
The people there could never possibly figure out how to run their shit without Big daddy America showing them the way! It's bullshit. They need Big Daddy America OUT OF THE WAY, so they can get on with it. Out of the way means no occupation, so obstruction of self-determination by fiscal manipulation, no strong-arming of international agencies and NGO's and the UN to make sure we get our way in that self-determination. Out of the way.

The Iraqi people are perfectly capable of forming their own government(s) and institutions, contracting independently with third party nations and institutions, and rejoining the world community that the US/UK colonizing forces have spent so long divorcing them from. The US/UK colonizing forces can no longer offer these banal apologias for their rank and obvious thievery. Out now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. There Is No Way Around Shi'ite Religious Rule, Sir
Without the iron-fisted totalitarianism which has ruled Iraq for the last several decades, unless the country were to be partitioned into Kurdish north, Sunni center, and Shi'ite south.

It is just one more facet of the "lose-lose" situation the criminals of the '00 Coup have contrived for themselves with this act of hubris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #29
47. Oh, indeed we could just leave!
Just have an election in Iraq. If they vote us out, we leave and let them rebuild their country however they see fit. We could continue with some monetary aid to help. But the bushites won't do that. They don't want to leave their sugar tit filled with oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dan Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
39. No one wants our soldiers to die, or
for that case Iraq people either. But this middle eastern mess has no win written all over it.

I am not sure that we can win.

I am not sure how we can exit this mess - without giving total control of the mess that we created to the U.N. along with a blank check. And, the more I think about it, I'm inclined to believe that is exactly what we will do. But that will require a change in administration here in the U.S. (because it will signal a major failure in foreign policy; and like it or not - a loss in the war column). Bush will bleed American (and coalition of the willing) troops dry before he will face the lost of his perceived prestige.

See, Bushy has never had to be accountable, nor responsible - so why would he start now.

We truly need an adult in the White House - or someone to admit (and take the appropriate legal steps) that the POTUS is incompetent and not mentally prepared for the responsibility of driving corporate ship America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I am not even sure what winning in Iraq would consist of
I really don't.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. HOPING?????????????????? They're dying! NOW!
Getting all delicate and pretending if we don't say it it won't happen isn't going to help a whole hell of a lot.

They're coming to kill us. Our soldiers. Our civilian corporate workers. We earned their hatred and they hate a long, fervent time.

The guerrillas are getting better at it and they're getting reinforcements. People who, left alone, spend their lives killing each other, are now miraculously united to kill Americans.

More of our people ARE going to get killed. Nothing we do has been able to stop it so far and it's going to get worse.

I WILL speculate on killing strategy because I want to know where and how it's coming. If the word is out, maybe one of ours can duck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat 333 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. AMEN to that ...
and I uttered, nearly, those exact words 13 (or whatever) years ago when this morons daddy was over their destroying Iraq for his own greedy interests. I don't think it was purely accidental that what happened on 9/11 - happened when rum dumb number 2 stole the US Presidential election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
46. We can't "finish the job".
We are making things worse by staying there. It won't improve. What would make it improve?

We should leave immediately. If we leave 5 years from now, the country will be 5 years worse off (both countries, U.S. & Iraq).

The problem is an unwillingness to abandon the oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
35. This is B.S
<SNIP>

The U.S.-led administration says it has a conservative oil revenue forecast of $12 billion for 2004. But if the Kirkuk pipeline cannot be kept open and the southern oilfields remain starved of electricity, exports could fall well short.

Even if the target is met, officials say, the international community will have to come up with more than $5 billion in aid at a donors' conference planned for Madrid in October, just to keep the floundering economy afloat next year. (Additional reporting by Luke Baker and Hassan Hafidh in Baghdad and Joseph Logan in Tikrit)

<SNIP>

It is the responsiblility of the U.S., not the international community. Until the U.S. quits playing its games and allows an international effort under international rules, it is the U.S. responsibility. By their own admission they will fall at least $5 billion short. Do you think they are planning for wys to fix this since they know it is comeing? Iraqis die, Bush lies and Bremmer don't even try. No wonder they hate us for. No Geo. it is not for our freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-17-03 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. "old" Europe is less likely to send aid
Since the latest UN show it's "Afghanistan first" - no aid (especially no troops) for Iraq until Afghanistan is up and running. Possibly civilian /reconstruction aid for Iraq if the US gets the security situation under control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QuietStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
44. recent explosion of the oil pipeline on the turkish side
Edited on Mon Aug-18-03 12:10 AM by QuietStorm
now a water pipeline. There does appear to be strategy at play here. This is not random and haphazard. In a strange way it makes me wonder in comparison to suicide bombers these guerillas really seem to mean business. They are attacking infrastructure, commodities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-03 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. The war is far from over.
140,000 GIs can barely guard Bremer and his entourage, how will they guard a Califonia-sized country? Our guys are sitting ducks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC