http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=434777A senior intelligence officer who wanted to inform Parliament of his concerns about the Government's Iraq dossier was told by his superior at the Ministry of Defence not to take the matter further, Hutton inquiry documents show.
An explosive letter, revealed in full as Downing Street officials prepare to give evidence to Lord Hutton's inquiry this week, makes it clear that the officer, whose name has not been revealed, felt "very uneasy" about claims made to MPs by Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary. Mr Straw said that the intelligence community had no complaints about the dossier but the intelligence officer had formally registered his concerns last September.
The officer, who described himself as "the most senior and experienced intelligence community official working on WMD", said on 8 July he feared that he "might be judged culpable" if he didn't come forward to correct Mr Straw's remarks to the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, and asked for advice on whether to do so. However, after David Kelly was found dead, Martin Howard, deputy chief of Defence Intelligence, wrote to the official to suggest that he should not take the matter any further.
The officer had formally complained on 19 September that he was unhappy with its use of intelligence. He wrote to the Defence Intelligence Staff technical department and Tony Cragg, the then deputy chief of Defence Intelligence. However, what was not revealed during the hearing was that the officer's letter had referred explicitly to Mr Straw's failure to tell MPs the full truth of such concerns.