|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:32 AM Original message |
jobless claims fall to 333,000(prior revised from 336 to 337-so drop of 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. But that's probably just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. exactly - unemployment running out is statisticly the same as being hired |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maeve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. No, this is initial claims, first filings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:44 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Thankyou for clearing that up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maeve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. The usual unemployment figures are from household surveys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 09:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
19. New jobs, laid off, no benefits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
5. Where is the RW getting this"680,000 jobs created last month" from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
imax2268 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. got me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:49 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. The household survey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Oh the one that showed 5.5% unemployment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 08:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Greenberg says to not use Household for jobs - only 60000 phone calls and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 08:16 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. That's a bit of a stretch on greenie's remarks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 09:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. They changed home workers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 11:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. And Greenie recommends against using Household for jobs - so main |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RivetJoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 07:49 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. The Households Report N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowFLAKE (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 08:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. It's quite possible that 680,000 jobs were created |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 08:24 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. That could be correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 08:27 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Sorry to correct again. BOTH figures are "net" growth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 08:38 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Okay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 10:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. The Discrepancy Is Probably Due To The Increase In Temp Work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unfrigginreal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
17. Unadjusted 8,000 increase translates to an adjusted 4000 decrease? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 09:02 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. "Seasonal" adjustments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-04 11:06 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Yet one more reason to follow 4 week averages - except when we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC