Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Supreme Court Refuses to Block Removal of 10 Commandments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:21 PM
Original message
BREAKING: Supreme Court Refuses to Block Removal of 10 Commandments
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 03:22 PM by FlashHarry
On the NY Times site now (3:24 p.m. CST) No story yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good
Finally some good news today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank God n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chico Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. God Bless America (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great News !!!
:bounce::kick::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. So CNN was right
They had it on the bottom of the screen 10 minutes ago as news that was "Just in." Then they took it off and pretended like it never happened. I was very confused. I don't know why they didn't say anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fabulous
They get it right sometimes. Without looking, who do you think voted which way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. On further thought
They probably declined to hear the case rather than voting on the issue. That's still fine. In fact, if they had heard the case, Moore would have had even more of an audience.

Can we move the cranes in now and remove the thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. Scalia, Rehnquist and Thomas still have some idea about the constitution..
If the court HAD heard the case (which would have delayed the "showdown" another 3-4 days, it would have been a unanimous "remove the monument." By rejecting to hear the case, Kennedy (the justice appealed to by Moore) is in effect saying, "we will unanimously reject your case, so we are not even going to waste the time."

I actually wish that the SCOTUS had heard the case, because a 9-0 rulin would have been an increadible bitch-slap to Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Score one for the good guys
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm surprised, really.
I really figured the Scalia Cult would overturn the Court of Appeals. Fortunately, this time the Constitution won.

So what's Judge Roy Bean gonna do?

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Now what?
I wondered what Moore will do now. He said he wouldn't take it down but now he is dealing with the supreme court. They should send in the national guard.

Does anyone know where the governor of Alabama stands on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Don't worry they may send in the National Guard
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 03:56 PM by 0007
It will be good propaganda against us evil bastards. Kind of like the Janet Reno thingy with that little Cuban boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here it is in all its glory
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 03:31 PM by Mari333
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'd rather not register. Was it just Kennedy?
Or did it go to the whole court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Whole court
N/A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Just Kennedy
"had pledged last week to defy the judge's order. His emergency stay request was filed Wednesday with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who oversees cases from Alabama. Kennedy referred it to the full court, which said in a one-sentence order that it was rejected."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. So it was the full court
I had heard that Kennedy could do it alone or refer it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. From what I gather, the Supreme Court did not grant Cert
It takes 4 Supremes to agree to take a case and grant certoriari. We can bet that Renhquist, Thomas, and Scalia wanted to take the case, but failed to dissuade the others to go along.

The Appeals Court decision stands!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. Moore wanted the decision stayed
Since he is supposed to remove the commandments by tonight. However, he can still appeal the case to the supreme court, but he will still be required to remove them tonight, but he decided he will violate the court's ruling. He could remove them, appeal to the supreme court, potentially win and put the commandments back. So, it isn't quite over yet, but it is a good sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
60. Dude, register!
NY Times rocks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Idiotic quote
Some idiot was quoted as saying, "You'll never remove it (the monument) from our hearts."

No one is in favor of removing the monument or God or anything else from anyone's heart. It's a government court house it has to be removed from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
41. Precisely.
That quote was from the Rev. Greg Dixon of Indianapolis Baptist Temple. Are we surprised? :eyes:

Truth be told, I strongly suspect that even their mean-spirited fundy version of God would much prefer that any commandments be enshrined in his followers' hearts rather than a block of granite, anyway. Even their own scriptures have words to that effect in several places, if memory serves.

These people drive me nuts. They're not content with living their own faith. Their entire purpose in all this is to impose their belief structure on everyone else and that is why the wall between church and state must be unassailable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
55. Carry it in your heart, indeed!
The paragraph from the story:

"Even if they should remove this monument -- and God forbid they do -- they'll never be able to remove it from our hearts," said the Rev. Greg Dixon of Indianapolis Baptist Temple.

Uh, Rev. Dixon? That's precisely where the commandments should have stayed in the first place. Neither you, nor Judge Dumbass, nor anyone else in the United States or the rest of the world has a right to impose your particular religious beliefs on me or anyone else, and you certainly don't have the right to put that huge boulder in a building paid for by everyone's tax dollars. Judge Dumbass may be the chief justice of the supreme court, but he didn't put that building up, and it'll be there long after his tenure is a sour memory.

Keep the commandments in your heart; don't shove them down my throat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's weird
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 03:32 PM by goobergunch
I have actually been agreeing with the Supreme Court recently. Now that's odd.

:bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benfranklin1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. AMEN!!!
Perchance Judge Moore has seen the light?? No chance of that regrettably no matter how much it costs that state...Methinks rather than the state diverting money to his contempt fund which could be better spent on the needy or on education Judge Moore should serve a contempt term so that he can experience the "joys" of prison firsthand. It might give him a different perspective when reviewing convictions and sentences.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Total Bullsh*t!

I was just about to erect a granite copy of "Satan's Hot & Fast Guidelines for Buggery, Abortion, Substance Abuse, and the Republican Party".


Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Heheh!
Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
57. Do it anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. These small battles....
...fatten the coffers of the Right Wing.

We will pay for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. No, real christians do not worship Idols
and evangelicals that back up this theocratic shit are not the majority in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. Halleluyaaaaa!!!!!
Thankk Zeus! Thank Hera! Thank Ahura Mazda! Thank Bramin! Thank all those guys (and lil' Jesus, too)!!! Now, if Att. Gen. Prior wasn't lying last month to the Congress, he'll march in there with a construction crew and some State Troopers and take that mostrosity outta there. And by monstrosity, I speaking in purely artistic terms. That is a terrible sculpture! It could have been done so much better - it looks like a tombstone! Hey, that's an idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. Good
religion and government don't mix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. From your NY Times article:
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 03:48 PM by JudiLyn
(snip) Crowds Flock to Back Alabama Judge on Biblical Monument
By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN

ONTGOMERY, Ala., Aug. 20 - They came streaming in from all directions, wearing their crosses and Confederate T-shirts, carrying dog-eared bibles and bottles of water and enough Power Bars to outlast a siege.

One man even walked from Texas, 20 miles a day, in a frock.

Their mission: to protect the rock, Roy's rock.

Their morale: high and rising.

Today is the deadline for Chief Justice Roy S. Moore of Alabama to remove the 5,280-pound monument of the Ten Commandments he installed in the lobby of the state supreme court.

But the rock ain't moving.

Despite threats of having his state fined $5,000 a day and being held in contempt of court, Justice Moore vowed to disobey a federal court order that begins at midnight. (snip)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`


This is OUTSTANDING! Thanks for posting it. It's time these pompous a$$e$ grasp the idea they are NOT holier than others. Just more obnoxious.


Buh bah, Judge Roy S. Moore
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. wtf? is it a church or a courthouse?
what a bunch of hooey!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Freeped poll on the subject here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. I wonder if Moore's supporters will make good on their threat
to encircle the sculpture to prevent its removal. Maybe since Saint Scalia couldn't even be bothered to take a stand, they'll all chicken out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabid_nerd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yay!
Edited on Wed Aug-20-03 04:14 PM by rabid_nerd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sperk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. who paid for the monument? 5000 lbs must have cost a bundle.
Why don't they just put a 5000 pound copy of the Koran next to it? Or how about the Wiccas? I'm sure they have some sort of holy book.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I wouldn't be satisfied until they had a 5000 lb Humanist Manifesto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldCurmudgeon Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #33
50. make it a 5000lb
golden calf of mammon, and all the rethuglicans can worship there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
58. They should allow the manifesto to stand too and Buddha ,realizing that
all of these are a part of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
46. it was a
conservative christian group that payed for it, and it was donatwed (I think) to Moore. Moore, IIRC, had this thing installed in the dead of night with complete secrecy. He KNEW it was illegal from the very beginning, and is a lying SOB...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. Absolutely the Best News of the Week!
Congratulations, FlashHarry, on breaking this story here at the DU!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hmm...
I guess Pat Robertson's prayers aren't strong enough. Surely, God will strike them down now.

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (AP) - Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson urged his nationwide audience Monday to pray for God to remove three justices from the Supreme Court so they could be replaced by conservatives.

``We ask for miracles in regard to the Supreme Court,'' Robertson said on the Christian Broadcasting Network's ``The 700 Club.''

Robertson has launched a 21-day ``prayer offensive'' directed at the Supreme Court in the wake of its 6-3 June vote that decriminalized sodomy.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-2909105,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Pat Robertson HIMSELF Is Offensive
A worthless turd of a human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
51. Does that mean I can pray for HIS death?
Because that's basically what he's asking for - "pray, mah brothers and sisters, p-ray! for those wicked, sinful, probably cross-dressing liberal commie inJustices to be 'removed'! And if, Lord blessed is his name, it takes some terrible accident, wink wink, then so be it. Yea, the LORD works in mysterious ways!"

I'm reminded of that old Bloom County bit where Bill the Cat became an evangelical preacher asking for money to have Swaggart, Robertson, etc "called home to heaven". Now there's a cause I would have funded!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. No brainer.
If he wants to display his fricking monument, he should put it on a truck and take it to his church. That is where it belongs.

NOT in a publicly funded building where laws are enforced. That should be an EXTREMELY secular venue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Totally agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
35. What if it were accompanied by monuments to...
...Hammurabi's Code, the laws of Justinian and the Magna Carta? Would that make it ok? (Just trying to play devil's advocate here. You could posit that those three, along with the 10 Commandments, form the foundation of American law.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. That would be more like it
but you would really have to be inclusive.

Does anyone know if our Constitution is on display in that building?
The Bill of Rights at least?

Those are the law of the land, and should be on display in every courthouse.

The state constitution would be a good addition as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldCurmudgeon Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
52. sure FlashHarry...
as long as they put up my favorite too:

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law



I'm sure that would look just peachy in front of the Ala. supreme courthouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudGerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #35
62. None of those would work in an American courthouse
Hammurabi's Code requires death for lots of infractions, and some of the punishments are kinda, um silly.

The Magna Carta isn't American, so that's out. I'm not aware of the laws of Justinian, so I won't say anything about it other than I'm off to look it up after this post.

The Ten Commandments are out based on the fact of what they are. What they aren't is the basis for American law, not even close. I don't remember the Bill of Rights mentioning anything about coveting, working on Sunday, worshipping a specific god, or banning other religions. Well, actually the Bill of Rights does mention that last bit, it says that its a big no-no. So, the Ten Commandments actually goes against our Constitution in some ways.

These people need to get it through their dense skulls that though most Americans are Xian, America is NOT a Xian society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. And on CNN...

"The justices said they would not be drawn, at least for now, into a dispute over whether the monument violates the Constitution's ban on government promotion of religion."

Full story:

http://edition.cnn.com/2003/LAW/08/20/ten.commandments.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
44. Oy, people are being arrested now
Where is the Judge? I wanted to see him dragged away, not some poor old gray-haired man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
45. did they just throw us a bone?
or did they stir the pot some more?

exactly, both...

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
47. From cnn.com
"U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson has said he may fine the state about $5,000 a day if the monument is not removed by the end of the day Wednesday. He has said it would be permissible for the monument to be moved to a less public site, such as Moore's office."

Or they can take the monnument and shove it up Moore's ass.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
49. WHY ISN'T THIS PIOUS F***WAD JUDGE BEING REMOVED?
It is more than obvious he is a religious nutcase who is unfit to be a judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. agree except that I think that he should be removed because he is a
judge who is defying a court order. What does he do when someone defies a ruling from his court?

Disrobe him!!!! snicker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. Because the people of Alabama elected him
I don't know if there is any easy way to get rid of a judge. If those Alabamans want him as their judge than so be it. There must be something wrong with the water down there. I saw rumors online that he might run for senate. Wouldn't that be scary, Senator Roy Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Doesn't mean he shouldn't go to jail for contempt.
I see other folks who violate court orders going to jail why should the state pay for his imaturity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. IMPEACH JUDGE MOORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
53. Move that rock out.
Arrest those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
63. Still doesn't make up for what they did in 2000.
Could it be that they are feeling GUILTY for their role in the 2000 coup? At least they got this one right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC