Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV: E-vote vendors may form a team

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 01:31 PM
Original message
BBV: E-vote vendors may form a team
Diebold participates in preliminary talk; benefits would include unified standards
By Erika D. Smith
Beacon Journal staff writer

With a relentless spotlight beating down on electronic voting, some vendors are getting a bit squeamish about facing new questions and criticism alone.

<snip>

Representatives from several vendors, including Green-based Diebold Inc., discussed forming an umbrella organization in a conference call Friday.

<snip>

To manage the industry's public image, a task force of experts would be established to combat studies from critics, such as the team from Johns Hopkins University that went after Diebold's touch-screen voting system.

<snip>

VoteHere took part in Friday's conference call, along with Microvote, Sequoia, Election Systems & Software and Diebold, among others.

more...http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/6600065.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad for the coverage, I suppose,
but what a "benign" face she put on that meeting.

Sigh.

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You don't suppose this was to defuse Bev breaking the story...
That would be my first guess. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. So it wasn't even a "secret" meeting after all?
Sheesh ... why am I not surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hi Fredda.
Gee, I wonder why you couldn't figure out that the reporter got the info from David's report on the meeting and Bev's media blast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. K, I'll ask
and share the response, if any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. No, she just ignored Bev's media blast and read the voting machine makers'
Edited on Mon Aug-25-03 12:32 AM by stickdog
nonexistent press release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Reading the article...
it seems to me, given that the writer doesn't credit a news release, spokesman, etc, for her information on the meeting, I would bet she learned of the meeting from BBV or scoop and then contacted some of the people she quoted for responses. Far from this saying it wasn't a secret meeting, I think it is the reverse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Backwater companies?????
Edited on Sat Aug-23-03 03:40 PM by seemslikeadream
No mention of the $200,000. Well I guess you would have had to been there and maybe took a look at some of those companies. How backwater is Mircosystems?

And by the way I think the fact that SAIC is verifing all these machines might be of slight interest to some folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. rather than spend millions on a PR campaign
why don't they just make them work properly. sheesh. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Because then the ReThugs Would Not Buy Them
> why don't they just make them work properly. sheesh. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-03 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. it means they are taking BBV seriously
Edited on Sat Aug-23-03 09:15 PM by bpilgrim
and a typical move on to deal with crtics in any industry really.

good job all :toast:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC