Seriously? Do you? :shrug: She's f*ckin' clueless!
http://www.elections.state.md.us/about_SBE/press_07252003.html<Snip>
Reactions to Recent Criticism of Voting Equipment - July 25, 2003Linda H. Lamone, Administrator
Maryland State Board of Elections
Linda H. Lamone, Maryland's chief election official, expressed her, "absolute confidence in the Diebold election system" despite criticisms in a recent report issued by Aviel Rubin, a researcher at the Johns Hopkins University. Ms. Lamone points out that, "not only did the Diebold system pass a strict State and federal certification process, but it also passed the one certification process that matters most -- an election. The system performed flawlessly and earned the trust of Maryland's election officials and voters, particularly the visually impaired and blind voters."
The report contains several significant flaws that make its conclusions unreliable and certainly overstated. Ms. Lamone addressed one significant flaw by noting that, "the report only focuses on the technological aspects of the voting system and fails to take into consideration any of the legal or procedural checks and balances that Maryland has in place to safeguard elections. I am disappointed that Professor Rubin never sought the input of this office or Diebold when doing his analysis." Diebold has issued an extensive report finding flaws with the methodology and conclusions of the report.
Ms. Lamone also noted that the Diebold system has many advantages over other voting equipment including:
1. It is compliant with State and Federal law;
2. Through its audio component, visually impaired and blind voters are allowed to cast their votes in complete privacy (as opposed to needing someone to mark their ballots for them);
3. It is capable of displaying a ballot in multiple languages; and
Election results are compiled much quicker and with absolute accuracy.
Ms. Lamone also gave assurances that, "voters can continue to have complete confidence in Maryland's election process."
<More>