Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court asks for quick response in Enron file release request

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 11:02 PM
Original message
Court asks for quick response in Enron file release request
Court asks for quick response in Enron file release request
By MARY FLOOD
Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today asked for quick responses from the parties in answer to a Houston Chronicle request that U.S. District Judge Kenneth Hoyt be ordered to release three sealed transcripts in an Enron criminal case and to stop holding closed hearings.

The newspaper asked Tuesday for an expedited hearing and the federal appellate court appears willing since it asked the parties to deliver copies of their responses by Monday afternoon to each member of a three-judge panel. The panel includes Judges Jerry Smith and Harold DeMoss Jr., both of Houston, and Carl Stewart of Shreveport, La.

Hoyt, based in Houston, is overseeing the cases against three former Enron executives, including ex-Enron Chief Financial Officer Andrew Fastow. The judge has held three closed hearings in the case, one on July 28 and two on Aug. 26. Fastow, Ben Glisan Jr. and Dan Boyle all have pleaded not guilty to charges of fraud in connection with various deals at Enron.

The Chronicle argued that Hoyt has failed to articulate a compelling reason for closing these pretrial hearings and his actions are "manifestly invalid under the First Amendment." The public's right to access to pretrial and criminal proceedings must not be lightly suspended, the newspaper argued.
more...

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/front/2081063


The Chronicle argued

"manifestly invalid under the First Amendment." The public's right to access to pretrial and criminal proceedings must not be lightly suspended, the newspaper argued.

Ya Damn Right! Open up this court and lets see the TRUTH! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. As I recall
The court's original reason for shutting out the media was because it would cause undue embarrassment to po' lil Andy Fastow in the Houston community to have his sins aired for everyone to read about, talk about and presumably have a damn good laugh about.

Well your honor, I submit that after all the money Mr. Fastow stole from the public, and considering that all that money has gone where the woodbine twineth (as railroad robber baron Jay Gould so memorably phrased it), the public, which has been cheated, robbed, and bled white by these latter day robber barons is entitled to laugh at their expense. They can certainly afford it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I totally Agree! Hearing this case behind closed doors is Criminal
Heres the possibilities cause the closer we get to Ken Lay the closer we get to Bush! :bounce:

We are moving up that food chain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can't wait to see the papers on the trial
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC