Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Slams Door on U.N. Inspections in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
peterh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:13 PM
Original message
White House Slams Door on U.N. Inspections in Iraq
<http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/5/123502.shtml>

United Nations -- Despite public pronouncements of wanting a "larger" role for the United Nations in Iraq, the Bush administration shelved (at least temporarily) any effort for the resumption of arms inspections by the world body.

"What is (David) Kay doing in Iraq? Nobody seems to know," asked one U.N. official.
The U.N. source speculated that had Kay and his U.S. search teams found anything substantive, news of the find would have leaked out.
A senior U.N. official told NewsMax that as time goes on and no proof emerges on any major weapons find, the suspicion that something could be "manufactured" grows:
"That is where we (the U.N.) come in. We could provide an independent verification of whatever the U.S. comes up with. We could provide credibility to the findings."

The dilemma for the U.S. could be that the U.N. might also throw doubt on any such findings.



Yep…we mustn’t complicate the delicate task that David Kay has of conjuring up his web of fabrications
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. They have no shame. None.
Lying bastards. Jumping Jeeeeehosophat! Lives are being lost on both sides, and they won't cooperate with inspectors. Bloodthirsty warmongers. :argh:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. to have shame,
one must possess a conscience.

The junta possesses no conscience, thus shame is not an available emotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. sarcasm - That liar! Bush said we had found the WMDs!
He said so! If Bush says so, then it is reality, right?????

end sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, this is not a surprise
what is a surprise is there are still people walking around who still fall for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. David Kay and 1200 agents must be doing something wrong
if they can't find WMD's in Iraq. Time to let a group who's really good at not finding them have another shot </sarcasm>.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. If in fact there are 1200
people searching on behalf of the chimp's next election scheme, I think congress should demand the price of this fishing trip. This broke-dick administration is crying for UN help, but would rather we foot the bill while the meter is running. What a crock of fical matter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. They are around Tikrit and Baghdad
north, west, east south....somewhat.

Didn't you know that? C'mon!

Heil Chimpster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. 1200?
Imagine the logisticle cost, the cost to proptect them..... And the very experienced UN has offered to do the job. Somthing is rotten in Iraq... No make that: somthing really stinks in the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tweekinnow Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
6.  Ha Ha Ha
the suspicion that something could be "manufactured" grows:

Says it all for me!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. is there any doubt that they'll try and manufacture WMD's?
the neocons have already tried to plant once. Blocking the UN inspectors just proves they're trying to pull something again, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No doubt whatsoever
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. The UN inspectors
will probably give Iraq a clean bill of health.
Iraq was recieving UN oil payments in euros NOT US dollars.

Once Iraq is free and clear, it will probably resume oil shipping - what little it can manage - and it will be paid in euros by the parties who are doing the buying. This will probably be supervised by the UN which allowed Saddam to set up the orginal euro account.

At present, the US is able to insist on payment being in dollars but it cannot maintain this position for long.
Once the last GI Joe in Iraq is killed, the dollar in Iraq will be history. And with that will crumble the mighty US of A.

They went in there to stop the petroleum from being sold in euros and that is the reason why they stay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. At the risk of exposing my ignorance here
Why would it matter if the oil was sold in Euros rather than dollars and why would that be more important than having direct control of the oil itself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. If I understand it correctly (and I may not!), it goes like this:
If an American Oil company wants to order 500,000 gal. of crude to be delivered and paid for next Janurary, the conpany buys it at say US$20/barrel. Next Jan. the company pays over that amount regardless of how the dollar may have fluxuated in the mean time - it's still $20. But if the currancy is Euros and say the price was EU$20, by next Jan. if the dollar has dropped campared to the EU, then EU$20 might equal US$40 in Jan. At least this is how it was explained to me as to why this was so important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-03 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. Thanks
That makes sense to me know and I can see why it would be such a big deal. With our country in such an economic mess and massive deficits, I can't see the dollar holding its value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Hey they already planted that fraud
Khidir Hamza in front of Congress and in all the media. He even has that "Saddam's Bombmaker" book out. They'll do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Stalinism is really kicking into overdrive, isn't it?
No one notices, even if they did, who would acre. Much more odious and hurtful lies from WMD to EPA have already gone Orwell-style into the Memory Hole.

The Amerikan Empire is HERE. And the dominant characteristics of said Empire are jaded laziness from the Serfs and Stalinist lies from the Busheviks.

What a sad, pathetic joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Are you planning to go to the Oct 25 demonstration? Perhaps if all of us
go with pots and pans (a la Argentina and Chile) we might get some attention if nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
short bus president Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Careful!
Those pots and pans might be mistaken for grenade launchers if you're of middle-Eastern descent, or for handguns if you're black.

"Their trigger fingers... want an excuse."

("Riot" - Dead Kennedys)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Boy! We are now worse off than the Argentinians and the Chileans! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Oh, I wouldn't say that yet
But I wouldn't vouch for the rest of the coming Bush Imperial Dynasty

2009-2017 Emperor Jeb
2017-2025 Emperor Ahnold "I'm a Mindless Bushevik Clone but They Needed Someone to Show We Aren't an Imperial Dynasty Because a Lot of People Werer Starting to Ask Questions So Here I am"

(this position could also be filled by Heydrich Racicot or Speer Ridge)

and of course, when the shit hits the fan

2025-2033 Emperor George P. Caligula

Oh, I suspect that by HIS reign, Chile and Argentina will be equal to us, if not better off, in more ways than one.

Of course, by then the Age of Totalitarianism will be well along, and Bushevik Darkness may have spread very widely by then, so maybe they WILL be worse off than our wretched descendants...

Boy would THAT suck, what could be worse than Imperial Amerika, circa 2030...the Old Soviet Union, circa 1950?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. The best thing about this article is that it is from Newsmax....
there was an editorial from the rightwing Union Leader on another thread which bashed the new RNC head, Gillespie. If I find a link I'll post it. The gist of it is that this GOP is not the GOP of a real conservative. It was a good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is all the proof I need that the Bushits
are planting WMDs in Iraq -- why else would they not want the help and expertise of the UN inspectors -- people who can actually tell the difference in weapons that the Iraqis made from the high grades ones the US makes. Something is definitely very rotten in these here United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. More proof that we needn't worry that the UN will bail Dubya out.
Dubya won't let it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. nevertheless, what I worry about
is a deal at Security Council level that would let the UN back in.

But last time they tried, bush* ended up not calling the cards as promised, and going away from the table. So I am hopeful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ha!
Le Figaro: "Bush's strategy is insolent. He is calling for help, then trying to dictate the terms of the rescue."

Le Figaro: "Why should it spill the blood of its soldiers and jeopardise the credibility of its diplomacy just to assure the re-election of George W Bush?"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3084060.stm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. Who needs UN inspectors? Our own people see there's nothing! Ex:


http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2003/08/24/international1334EDT0463.DTL&nl=fix

AP Exclusive: U.S. military analysts who
examined Iraqi drones discount Bush
administration view the unmanned aircraft
can spread weapons

DAFNA LINZER and JOHN J. LUMPKIN, Associated
Press Writers


Sunday, August 24, 2003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. I would like to say that I'm surprised
but with these clowns nothing would do that to me anymore. Shameful people. I couldn't live with myself if I was as low as our current administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. People who don't trust themselves don't trust anyone else
The Bushies obviously are projecting that the U.N. inspectors may fabricate evidence just as they would do. They're more mental than Nixon and just as detached from reality and paranoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-05-03 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. And more soldiers die because of neo-con hubris (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-03 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
31. chocolate eaters- zero, dick head-one
of all the cow flop tossing stupidity, this is right up there.
But I suppose you can't put them in if real inspectors are there.
Who would know a plant if not them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC