This war on terrorism is bogus

[veganwitch]

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/comment/0,12956,1036687,00.html


The 9/11 attacks gave the US an ideal pretext to use force to secure its global domination

Michael Meacher
Saturday September 6, 2003
The Guardian

Massive attention has now been given - and rightly so - to the reasons why Britain went to war against Iraq. But far too little attention has focused on why the US went to war, and that throws light on British motives too. The conventional explanation is that after the Twin Towers were hit, retaliation against al-Qaida bases in Afghanistan was a natural first step in launching a global war against terrorism. Then, because Saddam Hussein was alleged by the US and UK governments to retain weapons of mass destruction, the war could be extended to Iraq as well. However this theory does not fit all the facts. The truth may be a great deal murkier.

-----------------------------------------------------
im moving to england. theyve got smart people there.

[Resistance]

1. ok

you can say it over and over and over: The war on terror is bogus. A sham. A cover-up to more villainous schemes.

Whatever. The American people aren't listening.