Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's plan to remake Social Security: It isn't social and it isn't secure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 09:53 AM
Original message
Bush's plan to remake Social Security: It isn't social and it isn't secure
Edited on Tue Feb-08-05 10:11 AM by tk2kewl
Social Security and the oxymorons
Marie Cocco

February 8, 2005

As the year began, I said there were only two things Americans really needed to know about President George W. Bush's plan to remake Social Security: It isn't social and it isn't secure.

Now add two more truisms: It doesn't fix Social Security's finances. And it's not (really) your money.

The administration's habit of pumping up legitimate policy concerns into hyperbolic crises (WMD anyone?) haunts its proposal for Social Security overhaul. The president has warned for months that the program was going bankrupt, that no traditional fixes would shore it up and that creating private accounts would be its salvation.

The private-accounts-as-fiscal-rescue-plan pervaded Bush's rhetoric during his two presidential campaigns and, pretty much, right up until last week.

Then, something extraordinary happened: A "senior administration official" who briefed reporters told the truth. The transfer of payroll tax money into private accounts would in the long term have a "net neutral effect" on Social Security's fiscal situation. A "fair inference," the official said, is that private accounts do not contribute to solving Social Security's coming solvency problems.

So the president's plan does precisely nothing to address the crisis he keeps warning us about.

<snip>



http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpcoc084138297feb08,0,5424467.column?coll=ny-viewpoints-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Frankly, I think we're being enronized.
His plan is to divert funds for social programs into a war fund which has very little regulation, and which almost exclusively goes to Bush-Cheney cronies. Enron used the same method on California. Forced a crisis, used scare-mongering techniques, monopolized the bids and a few people from Texas got a little bit richer.

The scam that keeps on giving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's the new Ownership Society
Instead of the government collecting taxes, the owners of wealth will collect the taxes. Also known as feudalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC