Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ann Coulter's Newest Defecation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Catholic Sensation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:08 AM
Original message
Ann Coulter's Newest Defecation
http://www.anncoulter.org

Like I usually do, I'll take the biggest bullshit I can find and put the truth right after it:

On the basis of their recent pronouncements, the position of the Democratic Party seems to be that Saddam Hussein did not hit us on 9-11, but Halliburton did.

This is like beyond her normal level of idiocy. Usama bin Laden hit us on 9-11, why the fuck is that so hard for the right to understand?

By contrast, the German occupation was run as liberals would like to run postwar Iraq – a joint affair among "the Allies," the United States, Britain, France and the Soviet Union. It took 45 years to clean up the mess that created.

Only the Marshal Plan is considered one of the most successful acts ever done by the United States, sorry Ann, you lose again...

So naturally the Democrats are rooting for an international force in Iraq. The Democratic logic on national defense is: As soon as anyone in the military gets his hair mussed, we must pull out and bring "international peace-keeping" forces in. Our boys are in harm's way! People are dying! Bush lied when he said major combat operations were over! Let's run. That'll show 'em.

Since we already discussed the "hair mussed" comment a couple of days ago, there's no need to get into that piece of stupidity. However she fails to realize that it was Colin Powell who made the speech that we need the UN to be in Iraq last week...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. We weren't hit by Osama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dutchdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ann of Black Goebbels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Ooooo! That is such a good one!!
I wish I had thought of that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pert_UK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm just glad we don't get the insane bitch in the UK.......
To be honest, we really don't get ANY political commentators like this on mainstream TV in the UK.

Hoorah.

P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not sure I've ever hated anyone more than Coulter
Increasingly, I find myself wishing ill will upon her. She is a truly vomitable human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. vomitable.... nice word
applicable, too. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acerbic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just wondering: if that critter died violently, who could resist
...commenting that it got it's "hair mussed"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Coulter is a freak!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes, but...
she serves a valuable purpose to the So-Called Liberal Media. Having just finished Eric Alterman's book, I realize that this whack-job provides the impetus the other commentators need. After making up
her story, the other pundits can now report the lies as having been
reported.

So what we need to do is cut this poisonus tree off at its (dyed) roots. (In a purely legal method, of course. I don't want anyone thinking I would advocate anyone carrying out a poetic justice end).

MurrayDelph

Articles of Impeachment:Bring 'em On!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Germany was the 2nd largest economy in Europe by 1950....
Edited on Thu Sep-11-03 10:56 AM by Richardo
...2nd only to the UK and 4th in the world. That's five years, not 45, you miserable excuse for a flatworm.

By 1973, Germany was the largest economy in Europe.

http://www.theworldeconomy.org/MaddisontableB-18.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ann...
She's not worth the trouble hating and not worth the trouble to answer. Really... since when are Ann's faithful readers interested in the facts?

Her comment: "Saddam Hussein "hit us on 9-11" is simply laughable.

Her comment: "It took us 45 years to clean up that mess" is just another laughable statement.

Her comment in reference to getting one's hair mussed is nothing more than crude and tacky... and in a black humor sort of way, also laughable.

Certainly that women is no one to lead liberals and progressives around by the nose, which is what she does when she makes her inane statements and some of us feel the need to respond with facts.

I can understand your outrage, Neo Progressive. The woman is an insult... just a walking insult. But as such she has no place setting the agenda as to what issues liberals and progressives speak to. We have better and more important kinds of things to put out on the wires and that's what we need to do.

So, let's not hate Ann and let's not throw pearls to pigs by responding to her lies with facts either. The pigs won't "get it." Anyone mentions Ann Coulter to me... I laugh. That woman? Don't waste my time. If you don't want to talk about something really important... and there's plenty to talk about!... please be so kind as to take a hike. I've got work to do.

So do we all. We all have a lot of work to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Free_Thinker Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Transgendered Coulter?
Was she a colt before she became Ann?
She looks like a guy who underwent gender reclassification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Langis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Sounds like it to n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eauclaireliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. I said it before, I'll say it again...
The BLONDE leading the Blind...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnohoDem Donating Member (915 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Going out on a limb...
Edited on Thu Sep-11-03 09:30 PM by SnohoDem
We need to execute people like Ann Coulter in order to physically intimidate lying propogandists, by making them realize that they can be killed too. Otherwise they will turn out to be outright traitors.


DHS - relax, it's satire.

Edit: Changed subject after reading this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=323074

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wes Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Doesn't anyone get it?
She is a genius. She has figured out that that the more outrageous she is, the more money that conservatives will spend on her novels, oops, I mean books. Hell, I'd make up ridiculous b.s. for conseratives too if they'd make me a millionaire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catholic Sensation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. what's funny
I keep reading her columns and after she is done I keep expecting her to say "Haha, I'm kidding, I'm not really this stupid..." but it hasn't happened yet :/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldshoe Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. She is saying she is kidding
From:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93351,00.html

Notice how she shifts and slides between “joking” and “facts”. It isn’t until confronted that she reveals which is supposed to be which. Left unconfronted, you’d never know. If O’Reilly thinks she’s over the top, you know it’s gotta be bad.


O'REILLY: But, look -- look, here's -- here's the point. Here's the point. You basically are doing somewhat what the left-wing bomb throwers are doing.
COULTER: No.
O'REILLY: You demonize the oppo -- Oh, come one. Jimmy Carter, quote, "self-righteous, vengeful, sneaky, and backstabbing." Jimmy Carter!
COULTER: Oh, read the full sentence. It's so much better.
O'REILLY: It's more invective. Come on. Look, I don't agree with President Carter, and I think most politicians are sneaky and backstabbing, but...
COULTER: The full sentence was much funnier.
O'REILLY: All right. It's -- but it's not a matter of being funny. It's a matter of you having...
COULTER: It is a matter of funny.
O'REILLY: ... credibility in your crusade to convince Americans that there is a way to conduct themselves and be a good citizen. Isn't that what you want to do?
COULTER: No, I want to change people's minds. I am giving them an alternative view of history, and they've been having a false history force fed to them for 50 years and an outrageous history. I'm...
This is a history book. The fact that it's fun and light reading and I tell jokes is getting people to read it.
O'REILLY: Tell jokes. All right. Now how much of this is serious? One of your good friends is Bill Maher who's a -- totally opposite from you in his thinking, and you hang around with him. Do you call him sneaky and vengeful and backstabbing?
COULTER: No, that was Jimmy Carter.
O'REILLY: I know, but he's a liberal. Do you hate -- not hate him, but do you demean what he says?
COULTER: No, some of my best friends are traitors.
O'REILLY: Traitors? Is Maher a traitor?
COULTER: That's a joke.
O'REILLY: Is he a traitor?
COULTER: No, but he's a liberal. He's not...
O'REILLY: Yes, but you hang with him, you like him, you're friends. So why the vitriol in your book here?
COULTER: I don't have any vitriol directed toward Bill.
O'REILLY: Oh, Ann. You don't have any vitriol. What, is this the Wizard of Oz here?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-03 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Almost makes you wish
she'd go back to making death threats against Dems. At least we know she can't pick up anything bigger than a .22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Until recently I'd never heard of Coulter
thankfully, in aust, although we too have a generally woeful media, incediary ignoramus' like Coulter wouldn't last long, or atleast would be nothing but a figure of mirth and no-one on the right would go near her for fear of being tarred by the idiot brush

I first came across her rantings in a (not very flattering) feature in a weekend news magazine a month or so ago. I could not beleive that this massively ignorant woman was a commentator on hair dye let alone politics - the mind boggled.

The Saddam Hussein/sept 11 line has to be the zenith of stupidity - how can you be THAT thick and be a media talking head, I really don't get it - please tell me that she's not viewed as a serious political commentator by anyone who's parent's weren't related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catholic Sensation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-03 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
20. my post on free republic criticizing the bitch
Edited on Fri Sep-12-03 06:32 AM by Neo Progressive
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/980455/posts?page=39#39

I like the use of Triumph the Insult Comic Dog's tag line...

Edit: Those assholes deleted the post... And apparently my posting privs are no more either. Whatever, I had two windows to the post openned, so luckily I got a screenshot of what I said, incase any of you care...

neo-progressive.net/freep-deleted.jpg (couldn't link to it, because it showed up in the post)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC