This is not good.
<clips>
The campaign became public three weeks ago, during the Senate confirmation hearings of Condoleezza Rice, who made numerous references to President Chavez, at one point calling him a "negative force in the region." The comments prompted strong rebukes from Democratic and Republican members who were concerned that the State Department position on Venezuela amounted to meddling with a democratically elected and popular government. Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffee called the remarks "disrespectful" to Chavez and "to the Venezuelan people" who have supported the administration in a half dozen elections and referendums since 1998.
Still, Secretary
Rice's words set off a series of behind-the-scenes activities against the Chavez administration. Earlier this month, the State Department sent letters to South American leaders asking them to side with Colombia against Venezuela in a dispute between the two countries. Even former Colombian ambassador to Venezuela, German Bular Escobar, noted that the US pressure was not helpful to the dispute-resolution process.
In addition, State Department officials lodged a "secret"--but publicly leaked--protest with Russia for selling rifles to Venezuela as part of a standard security acquisition. In a not-so-subtle quote in today's Washington Times,
an unnamed "senior U.S. official" claims that Chavez is "consolidating a dictatorship. It's a Cuban-style dictatorship. He's arming loyalists and setting them lose to intimidate people at the city block level."
Less recognized, but perhaps more sinister, was something that occurred four days prior to the Rice hearings.
On January 14th, three major newspapers ran reports on Venezuela--on the same day and with the same premise--arguing that the State Department needed to step up its activities in Venezuela. http://www.globalexchange.org/tours/venezuela/2848.html