No kidding. Why can't Fitzgerald get the names from Novak? To the Editor:
Re "Jailing of Reporters in C.I.A. Leak Case Is Upheld by Judges" (front page, Feb. 16):
I don't get it. Federal appeals court judges order that two reporters - Judith Miller of The New York Times and Matthew Cooper of Time magazine - should be jailed for contempt for refusing to name their sources to a grand jury investigating the disclosure of the identity of an undercover C.I.A. officer, Valerie Plame.
Yet you say it is "not known" if Robert Novak, who disclosed Ms. Plame's identity in his syndicated column, has even been subpoenaed. If Mr. Novak has been subpoenaed, he has either revealed his source or refused to reveal it. If he has revealed the source, why hold Ms. Miller or Mr. Cooper for contempt? If he has not, using the flawed logic of the court, why has Mr. Novak not been cited for contempt?
Why are Ms. Miller and Mr. Cooper being harassed when Mr. Novak was the one who disseminated the identity of Ms. Plame in the first place?
Thomas Linden, M.D.
Chapel Hill, N.C., Feb. 16, 2005
The writer is a professor of medical journalism at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/18/opinion/l18press.html?