Joseph Wilson: Seeking honesty in U.S. policy

[Barrett808]

Commentary: Seeking honesty in U.S. policy
By Joseph Wilson
Published 9/19/2003 12:42 PM

WASHINGTON, Sept. 19 (UPI) -- During the Gulf war in 1991, when I was in charge of the American Embassy in Baghdad, I placed a copy of Lewis Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland" on my office coffee table. I thought it conveyed far better than words ever could the weird world that was Iraq at that time, a world in which nothing was what it seemed: The several hundred Western hostages Saddam Hussein took during Desert Shield were not really hostages but "guests." Kuwait was not invaded, but "liberated."

It is clearly time to dust the book off and again display it prominently, only this time because our own government has dragged the country down a rabbit hole, all the while trying to convince the American people that life in newly liberated Iraq is not as distorted as it seems.

It is returning to normal, we are assured, even as we are asked to ante up an additional $75 billion and pressure builds to send more troops and extend the tours of duty of those who are there. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz tells Congress that all we need is to project a little confidence. The Mad Hatter could not have said it better.

President Bush's speech last Sunday was just the latest example of the administration's concerted efforts to misrepresent reality -- and rewrite history -- to mask its mistakes. The president said Iraq is now the center of our battle against terrorism. But we did not go to Iraq to fight al-Qaida, which remains perhaps our deadliest foe, and we will not defeat it there.

By trying to justify the current fight in Iraq as a fight against terrorism, the administration has done two frightening things. It has tried to divert attention from Osama bin Laden, the man responsible for the wave of terrorist attacks against American interests from New York and Washington to Yemen, and who reappeared in rugged terrain in a video broadcast last week. And the policy advanced by the Bush speech is a major step toward creating a dangerous, self-fulfilling prophecy and reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the facts on the ground.

This is an insurgency we're fighting in Iraq. Our 130,000 soldiers in Iraq now confront an angry but not yet defeated Sunni Muslim population who, though a minority in Iraq, had been in power for a century. We are now also beginning to face terrorists there, but it is our own doing. Our attack on Iraq -- and our bungling of the peace -- led to the guerrilla insurgency that is drawing jihadis from around the Muslim world. The "shock and awe" campaign so vividly shown on our television screens has galvanized historic Arab envy, jealousy and resentment of the United States into white-hot hatred of America.

Where once there were thousands, now there are potentially millions of terrorists and sympathizers who will be drawn into this campaign.

(more)

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030919-122231-9291r

[indepat]

1. If there are potentially millions of terrorists and sympathizers where

once there were thousands, would it be safe to wonder if we are now exponentially less safe by reasons of our pre-emptive bombardment, conquering, and occupation of Iraq?

[Resistance Is Futile]

2. Realpolitik

Seeking honesty in foreign policy is rather like seeking virginity in a whorehouse.

[alfredo]

3. The dishonesty is not as disturbing as the incompetence.

the dishonesty carried out with skill is far better than dishonesty teamed with incompetence.

[Eloriel]

4. Hero

I love this man. Superb article.

Indeed, in the most telling revision of the justification for going to war, the State Department's undersecretary for Arms Control, John Bolton, recently said that whether Saddam's government actually possessed weapons of mass destruction "isn't really the issue. The issue, I think, has been the capability that Iraq sought to have . . . WMD programs."

Really, now, *I* am capable of seeking to have WMD.

Eloriel