By Robert Parry
In evaluating the case for impeaching George W. Bush over the Iraq War,
his deceptions about weapons of mass destruction most readily come to
mind, but there is also the incompetence of his military strategy, especially
Bush’s refusal to recognize how such a complex project might go terribly
wrong.
Rather than look at the military prospects realistically, Bush and his advisers pursued a
consistent policy of wishful thinking, deceiving the American public about the war’s cost in
both money and blood, and ultimately deluding even themselves.
From the expected flower-strewn Iraq welcome in March 2003 to the cheery predictions
after the Shiite election win in January 2005, the war has suffered from a macabre “Peter
Pan” syndrome, that happy thoughts and some pixie dust of propaganda could lift the U.S.
to victory – when instead it has sent tens of thousands of people to unnecessary deaths,
including almost 1,700 American soldiers.
Reality was banished not only from the pre-war WMD justifications, it’s been barred from
mid-war assessments, too. But the hard truth – recognized from the start by many military
experts – was that U.S. chances for prevailing in Iraq were never very good and certainly
would come at a high price.
As for the practicality of Bush’s impeachment over the Iraq debacle, the Republican
control of Congress may make the debate more theoretical than realistic. But two
interrelated arguments could reasonably create a foundation for impeachment: the lies that
led the nation into the quagmire and the military negligence that left an American army
bleeding in this death trap.
The argument for negligence goes directly to the question of why Bush embraced wishful
thinking over cautionary military advice in his rush to war – and whether Bush’s level of
incompetence meets the constitutional standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2005/061205.htmldp