http://jameswolcott.com/Posted by James Wolcott
******
What their chat boiled down to is that as a second-term president Bush doesn't have to heed the declining poll numbers over Iraq. He has the luxury of being unswayable. This was said by Kristol with the prissy superarrogance that we have come to expect from Beltway neocons, for whom no sacrifice is too great to make for the grand mission as long as some other chump is making it. Gazing into his Kristol ball, son of Irving said that Bush basically has a free hand for another year or so to defeat or at least subdue the insurgency, regardless of how much the press clamors and domestic support slides.
This marks a tactical shift from the stay-the-coursers. Only a few weeks ago, White House flacks and their shoeshiners in the media were shrugging off the bad poll numbers with "Hey, polls go up and down." You know, sorta like the stock market. You just gotta ride out these bumps. But now that it's clear even to Bush fantasists that the polls numbers on Iraq aren't going up and down, they're only going in one direction, and picking up speed as they descend, they're saying that the opinion of the American people must be discounted for their own good. The will of the people must take second place to the wiser, stronger will of those in charge.
*********
Here's what I'm wondering. Bush is making a major national address on Tuesday about Iraq. With each speech he masticated about Social Security "reform," approval for his non-existent program sagged. His sixty-day sales tour was a Willy Loman flop. Suppose he makes a rallying call on Tuesday and his poll numbers subsequently drop even more?
**********