Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Bombs with Troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Mortos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 09:19 AM
Original message
Bush Bombs with Troops
Edited on Thu Jun-30-05 09:35 AM by Mortos
What a difference a year and a half fighting in an quagmire makes.

President Bush attempted to make another rah rah patriotic speech to a favorable crowd, selecting Fort Bragg and 700 U.S. soldiers to help sell his war to a rapidly turning American Public.

Unfortunately for Bush and his propaganda team, no one told the soldiers.

The repetitive, catch phrase laden speech did nothing to clear up the floundering "war President's" message nor did it give any justification for a war that has cost the lives of over 1750 of his hand selected audience's compatriots.

The silence of the crowd was deafening, especially when compared to Bush's previous speeches to the military.

Let's look at Bush's famous Thanksgiving Day speech in Iraq a short year and a half ago.

As Bremer prepared to read a presidential proclamation to the troops, he said, "Let's see if we've got anybody more senior here who can read the president's Thanksgiving speech. Is there anybody back there who's more senior than I?"

Bush then emerged, misty-eyed and wearing a U.S. Army exercise jacket, to a roaring ovation.

The shocked and elated soldiers jumped to their feet, pumped their fists in the air, roared with delight, and grabbed their cameras to snap photographs.


The Thanksgiving Day speech (or the Turkey in Tikrit as I like to call it) was interrupted over 13 times by raucous applause, cheering and hooahs. Bush could barely get through a paragraph without having to stop for the adoring applause of the troops. The speech, which was only ten paragraphs long took twice as long to give because of the constant interruptions (complete text of speech and applause interruptions).

Cut to present day. The White House team had allotted 40 minutes for Tuesday's 28 minute speech to accommodate all the expected cheering and clapping from the loyal troops. The President entered to dead silence. He proceeded to give his speech and the only applause came at the end when "over exuberant" Bush staffers initiated a short burst of polite applause. The speech ran 28 minutes.

Spin control began immediately with claims that the soldiers had been told not to applaud. Later clarification proved that the soldiers had been told not to "carry on", a big difference between acting too boisterously and clapping. There is nothing to indicate that this administration has ever discouraged any crowd from cheering this President and if this was such a somber speech it could have, and should have been delivered from the oval office.

It appears that Bush has lost one of his most ardent support systems, the military and for a "war president" that loss is devastating.

By Steven J. Vincent

Contrast and compare.

Video of the Fort Bragg speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I sure hope this is correct.
If the Chimperor loses the military's support, he's fatally weakened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. The applause excuse fails the smell test.
If the soldiers were really enthusiastic, they would damn sure applaud anyway. Can you imagine stopping them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3.  Steven, good work...hopefully, not only Bush, but also the repubs
will lose some of the military vote...2006 is going to be a very important election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did you write this?
'cause I like it. This part has a double meaning when I read it quickly: "catch phrase laden speech"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mortos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes I wrote it
and didn't intentionally put that double meaning in there but I like it. Makes me seem smarter than I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC