punishment and to chill dissent. Not hard to believe, given Rove. But I think it's more likely that that is a cover story, designed to keep Cheney out of it. He sends Wilson to Niger, knowing he won't find anything. Wilson comes back, reports he didn't find anything. "Somehow" it gets into Bush's speech anyway; Wilson gets ticked off, and goes public. Thus the excuse is created to out Plame and her entire covert WMD network.
I think the main goal was to out Plame and her WMD network--to protect something, maybe a plot to plant WMDs in Iraq (or later, Iran, Syria, No. Korea?), or Cheney's shady arms dealings. It makes a lot of things make more sense when you look at this way. (For instance, how DID that item get into Bush's speech? They knew it was bogus, and knew that it was provably bogus, with a witness to its bogusness. And it got in there accidentally? Right.)
Then the odd story gets around that Wilson having a wife who is a CIA WMD expert somehow...taints him, discredits him? Why would it? It would seem to enhance his ability to get good intel. Doesn't add up. --until you see where it's pointing--AWAY from Cheney (it wasn't Cheney who chose Wilson to go to Niger; it was Plame, because she's a CIA agent...etc., etc. Huh?). (Would a diplomat be running off the Niger, on behalf of the Bush regime, to do a WMD investigation, WITHOUT Cheney's approval--Cheney, who was cooking intel at the time? That is not at all likely.)
See
Plame...the tip of the iceberg... (Plame maybe investigating Cheney arms deals when they busted her CIA weapons op)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2178477#2180220And also (curious Judith Miller connection):
(Plame/Miller/David Kelly)
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/3/17138/30618-------
The answer to the stink in Washington DC is restoring our right to vote, by throwing Bushite electronic voting machine companies--Diebold, ES&S and brethren--out of the election business NOW--or at the least achieving some measure of election transparency with paper ballot backups, no secret programming code and strict auditing. The only place where we can get that done is in state/local jurisdictions, where the authority over election systems still resides, and where ordinary people still have some say. See the DU Forum "2004 Election Results and Discussion" for information and action ideas:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203