Just sent to my local paper, Rove of course.

[usregimechange]

In the fall of 2003 White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said that Karl Rove and other Bush Administration officials “have told me they are not involved in” revealing the identity of Ambassador Wilson’s wife who worked for the CIA. Recall that days before her CIA status and name was revealed by “senior” Bush Administration officials her husband was doing damage to one of Bush’s State of the Union Iraq war justifications. Coincidence?

Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper has disclosed that Rove did reveal to him that Wilson’s wife was a CIA Agent. Rove decided to allow Copper to testify to this rather than keeping it confidential after about two years of obstructionism. If he had nothing to hide why did he not volunteer the information years ago? But Scott McClellan said Rove told him he wasn’t involved. Did the special prosecutor get similar testimony under oath? Does "not involved" mean he was involved a little? Does it depend on what the definition of "is" is?