Intelligence Officers: Can We Trust Our President?
by SusanHu
Sat Jul 16th, 2005 at 07:22:04 PDT
Front-paged at BoomanTribune.com.
Also see, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/16/10224/0748
Longtime intelligence colleagues have joined to ask the ultimate question:
Can the intelligence community trust our president?
The longtime colleagues -- Brent Cavan, Jim Marcinkowski, Larry Johnson, and Jane Doe -- "presented the following statement at a hearing on Capitol Hill in October 2003."
Writes Larry Johnson, a former (senior) C.I.A. and U.S. State Dept. intelligence analyst -- this morning, July 16, 2005, at his blog No Quarter http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/07/the_intelligenc.html --
In light of the latest White House sanctioned assault on Valerie Plame and her character, our <2003> testimony remains relevant and accurate.
My notes: As I read this, I feel the deep caring and passion that these four have for each other and Valerie Wilson. I also feel the deep anger -- grief, really -- that they have experienced since this mess broke out in 2003, without abatement because the White House refuses to stand by its word, or even stand at all for anything resembling integrity and the protection of its key intelligence employes.
"In light of the latest White House-sanctioned assault on Valerie Plame and her character ..."
SNIP
Brent Cavan and Larry Johnson worked as analysts in the Directorate of Intelligence. Jim Marcinkowski and Jane Doe were case officers and served overseas. Jane Doe's real name is not being used because she was involved in counter terrorism operations and could be at risk if her identity were divulged.
We've got each other's back. ...
The undercover group's 2003 statement continues:
snip
It is because of this bond of trust that the authors of this piece and two other colleagues, all former intelligence officers, appeared on ABC's Nightline to speakout on behalf of the wife Ambassador Joseph Wilson, a sensitive undercover operative outted by columnist Robert Novak.
The Ambassador's wife (we decline to use her name) is a friend who went through the same training with us. We acknowledge our obligation to protect each other and the intelligence community and the information we used to do our jobs.
We are speaking out because someone in the Bush Administration seemingly does not understand this, although they signed the same oaths of allegiance and confidentiality that we did.
SNIP
Beyond supporting Mrs. Wilson with our moral support and prayers we want to send a clear message to the political operatives responsible for this. You are a traitor and you are our enemy.
You should lose your job and probably should go to jail for blowing the cover of a clandestine intelligence officer.
You have set a sickening precedent. You have warned all U.S. intelligence officers that you may be compromised if you are providing information the White House does not like.
A precedent, as one colleague pointed out during our brief appearances, allows you to build out a case based on previous legal actions and court decisions. It's a slippery slope if it lowers the bar.
Ambassador Wilson's political affiliations are irrelevant. Political differences serve as the basis for the give and take of representative government.
snip