Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Typical LTE: Media will not come out the winner in this situation (Plame)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:51 PM
Original message
Typical LTE: Media will not come out the winner in this situation (Plame)
Anyone wondering why Dan Rather would try and pose phony documents as investigative journalism or Newsweek would try and convince the public that a Quran can be flushed down the toilet need only follow the partisan mainstream media's attack on Karl Rove.

Letters to this paper indicate that they have again succeeded in duping a section of the public.

The facts are slowly emerging. Joseph Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, is no longer (and hasn't been for years) a super-secret CIA classified agent. In fact, all her friends and neighbors (and some journalists) knew she worked for the CIA. How did they know? She told them, outing herself.

Rove never approached the media about Plame; the media approached Rove and broached the question of why Vice President Dick Cheney could possibly have recommended Wilson.

Wilson had no Secret Service training. He was more likely to be mistaken for a 12-year-old boy who just got his secret decoder ring and magnifying glass out of a Cracker Jack box. The media were flummoxed as to why ferreting out the truth about Saddam Hussein's attempt to purchase uranium from Africa would be left to such a buffoon.

When the dust is settled, Rove will not be charged and the mainstream media will have lost even more of the American people's trust.

Jerry Rhodes
Bothell

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/233071_ltrs19.html



The ignorance. Words fail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. they are desperate
and it's not working
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I just spent two days argueing this stuff
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 11:57 PM by caligirl
at college confidential(parent cafe) with two posters who at least post that this is what they hold to be true. They are dead set on this version.

Start at page 11, look at Strict11 and Driver's posts.
http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?p=1052593#post1052593
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. plain and simple...
wilson's analysis was right, the docs were phony and bushCo had to admit as much. end of story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. not "super-secret CIA classified agent"
so its ok to out her if she is just a secret agent, but not a "super-secret" agent? :shrug:

wait let me get my decoder ring to find out for sure! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. This guy is reciting Rush Limbaugh's talking points...
This entire shtick is Limbaugh's talking points.

It's as if this guy lifted Limbaugh's words from the radio and put them in print.

You gotta wonder how stupid someone can be. They write a letter to the editor--as if it's their own well-thought-out opinion--when really it's nothing more than regurgitated junk food from Limbaugh.

Either this guy is really ignorant, or the neocons have a LTTE campaign going on.

Today, Limbaugh hammered repeatedly on the media. I think he does this to intimidate them. He mentioned that the Plame situation is no different than the Rather situation. He droned on and on about how the media will be running from this story pretty soon--and that it will all come to light "the truth about Joe Wilson and his wife."

I guess the rightwingnuts are planning a big "We don't like Joe and his wife" campaign.

Limbaugh also said, "The Dems are doing what they did with Nixon. They hate Bush, like they hated Nixon and they're trying to drive him out. It won't happen. It's not going to happen. Not this time. They have conservative radio, unlike in the Nixon days when the wet-noodle Republicans caved and Nixon was gone."

Rush actually believes that he can save they day by spinning, screaming and lying. Crazy.

Rush also talked about the USSC situation. He mentioned that he's spoken on the phone a few times with Scalia and that Thomas is "a close, personal friend." What a farce. This lying, propagandist, truth distorter maintains close relationships with members of our Supreme Court. It's so revolting.

I know many probably don't want to hear anything about Limbaugh. However, I think he should not be ignored. I don't go out of my way to listen, but if I'm in the car with my kids, I tune in.

I think he should be monitored closely. If a rattlesnake slithered into my house, I wouldn't ignore it. I'd watch it's every move.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Aren't Rush's talking points actually Rove's?
The MSM actually printed the list of talking points a week or so ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mokito Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is this written
by a man or a tape recorder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC