Agent’s ‘Outing’ A National Outrage - Joe Conason

[TacticalPeek]

What kind of government would condone a political crime that may have endangered human lives and damaged national security?

snip

In the Bush White House, holding everyone to the very highest standards is apparently best accomplished by ignoring whatever they’ve actually been up to. For example, it would be difficult to reconcile those demanding standards with revelations in The Washington Post that two administration officials had "cold-called" at least six journalists to leak Ms. Plame’s identity.

more

http://www2.observer.com/observer/pages/conason.asp

[GOPFighter]

1. Damn Right

Robert Novak played the patsy for the White House. He knew this was nothing more than a cheap retaliatory message to anyone else who dared to contradict the White House. Novak is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Bush Administration. He deserves to go to jail for this.

[skip fox]

3. I disagree. Not relaliation, but . . .

I keep pushing my pet purpose, but let me lay out the four commonly referred to:

1. Revenge on Wilson.

2. Warning to any others with similar information or gripes.

3. To indicate nepotism, and thus discredit Wilson.

4. To imply the trip was self-initiated (Wilson got wife to send him) and thus discredit Wilson.


These are not, as is often pointed out, mutually exclusive. But the primary one is #4. If the
administration could show that Wilson was chomping at the bit to get to Niger, they could paint him
and his investigation as partisan. The story would run: Here's Wilson yelling about the false
information in the President's speech, but no one could really believe his investigation in Niger was
objective since he was a Clinton man, got himself assigned to Niger the previous fall, then found
what he WANTED, and reported to the CIA. It is little wonder that the President gave no credence to
Wilson's report. We've seen him as a maverick all along.

The nepotism "take" (3) was thick-headed Novak's, who simply didn't "read" the leak in the manner
intended.

#1-2 are side benefits, only, not the primary reasons IMHO.

Once we see #4 as primary, we see another kind of mind working. One which is intelligent, cold and
dispassionately calculating, trying to substitute one narrative to undercut another. Not a mind given
to firebombing opponents (like Rove?), but one which tries to quickly and surely relegate Wilson to
the junkpile of history. Nothing personal; he's just gone. No credibility. No more editorials. Nada.

To my mind, this places it in Cheney's lap.


#1-2 (revenge and warning) make better stories, but they might draw us away from the true
leakers.

IMHO

[realFedUp]

2. give me a cuppa joe.

:loveya: