Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rising up to nullify eminent domain ruling (with 'just desserts' for USSC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Vitruvius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 10:52 AM
Original message
Rising up to nullify eminent domain ruling (with 'just desserts' for USSC
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 10:56 AM by Vitruvius
by Kenneth Harney

<SNIP> In the four weeks since the Supreme Court sanctioned the seizure of private homes by municipal governments for private "economic development," a firestorm of reaction has broken out in dozens of state legislatures and in Congress. <SNIP> Name another issue where House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), the House's lone self-described socialist, Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), evangelical Christian groups, Rush Limbaugh and Ralph Nader all are on the same side.

Waters denounced the decision - which she said would weigh most heavily on minority and poor neighborhoods - as "the most un-American thing that can be done." DeLay called the ruling "a travesty." A few of the opponents of the Kelo decision are looking to mount direct action - sometimes tongue in cheek. A California-based group called Freestar Media Llc is organizing an effort to persuade the town council of Weare, N.H., where Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter owns property, to condemn the land in order to give it to developers who promise to construct a hotel on the site, substantially raising town revenues and employment in the process.

Souter voted with the majority in the case. The name of the proposed project: The Lost Liberty Hotel, which will also feature a restaurant called the Just Desserts Cafe.

Logan Darrow Clements, chief executive of Freestar, insists "this is not a prank. The Town of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter, we can begin our hotel development."

Just desserts indeed. :evilgrin:

MORE at http://www.newsday.com/business/realestate/ny-bzharney4351374jul22,0,1945634.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. No one minded when the government took the
homes and businesses of poor people claiming they were "blight." That has been going on for a long, long time -- community redevelopment. You get "just compensation," whatever that means. The right way to get rid of "blight" is to empower the people who already own the properties to improve their properties or live in the area through grants (how about "incentives" that would require the private foundations that fund the right-wing movement to give some of their money to get rid of urban blight?) and loans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vitruvius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. So true. And the rich and well-connected are so arrogant
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 11:08 AM by Vitruvius
they don't know when to stop -- and they're going after working class and middle class homes & businesses. Angering enough people with the power to fight back. Hopefully, the result will end up giving us protections that will help ALL people.

The larger lesson for all Americans is: anything they can do to poor people today, they can and will do to any and all of us tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Pennsylvania's "Instant Millionaire" Eminent Domain Law
was passed by an NAACP organizer (Frankie Mae Jetter), a liberal community organizer (Martie Krauss) and an ACLU pro bono lawyer (Ed Mannino) - passed by a hard line leftie Governor (Milt Shapp - the gazillionaire inventor of cable tv) and really given muscle for the poor by a leftie Supreme Court Justice (Nick Papadakos).

Since it has been passed and implemented - there hasn't been much private eminent domain action in Pittsburgh (cheaper to privately negotiate a deal with a "recalcitrant property owner" then to risk eminent domain and a much higher award - and that's the idea).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. You don't see this uprising in Pennsylvania
because Pennsylvania has "Instant Millionaire" eminent domain-- even after the local "Board of Viewers" get their kick back and skim, and your local political parasites get theirs -- the homeowner comes out with well over 300% of what would be the "fair market value" in most other states. It's a formula called "comparable home in a comparable community" -- and was rushed through the legislature to build I-95 through Philadelphia and I-279 through Pittsburgh.

When the State took farmland in Fayette County (South west of Pittsburgh on the WV border) to build I-70, the farmland was assessed at its value for highway interchange commercial development + plus a further sweetener.

The formula is so generous that it discourages eminent domain for private (non-governmental) projects.

(Heck - before Pete killed Skybus - we were hoping Skybus East would have gone past our house --- instant millionaires - could have bought in Upper Saint Claire or Mt. Lebanon :) with the rich folks).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC