Ol' Howie can occasionally hit the nail on the head.
Check it out. It's a piece on the war between the CIA and the WH.
<snip>
IN WASHINGTON, legal controversies are like whitecaps on a stormy sea: surface manifestations of stronger, deeper forces. Watergate wasn’t really about a third-rate burglary, or even obstruction of justice, but about the political establishment, and, eventually, the country, rising against Richard Nixon’s megalomaniacal presidency. The impeachment of Bill Clinton wasn’t really about perjury, per se, it was about the culture wars of the ’90s: his laissez faire mores vs. the GOP’s (often hypocritical) Bible Belt propriety.
Now a new legal firestorm is consuming the Beltway world. The plot line: Unnamed White House insiders are being investigated by the Department of Justice for having leaked the name of a CIA operative, supposedly with the aim of discrediting or intimidating her husband, Wilson, a former American diplomat who had the temerity to attack President Bush’s decision to go to war in Iraq. There are the inevitable calls for a “special prosecutor” and lots of heavy breathing by the usual legal pundits who emerge from their law school carrels at such times. But what’s this new furor really about? Here is my sense:
</snip>
I particularly liked this line:
The impeachment of Bill Clinton wasn’t really about perjury, per se, it was about the culture wars of the ’90s: his laissez faire mores vs. the GOP’s (often hypocritical) Bible Belt propriety. (emphasis mine)