Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some may think Larouche is nuts and...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:42 PM
Original message
Some may think Larouche is nuts and...
I hope you are right



WARNING FROM LYNDON LAROUCHE
Cheney's 'Guns of August' Threaten the World
by Jeffrey Steinberg

Lyndon LaRouche, on July 27, issued an international alert, covering the period of August 2005, which is the likely timeframe for Vice President Dick Cheney, with the full collusion of the circles of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, to unleash the recently exposed plans to stage a pre-emptive tactical nuclear strike against Iran.

The danger of such a mad, Hitler-in-the-bunker-style aggressive military action by the Cheney circles would be even further heightened, were the United States Congress to stick with its present schedule, and go into recess from July 30 until Sept. 4. With Congress out of Washington, and with President George W. Bush on extended vacation in Maine and Texas, the Cheney-led White House would almost certainly unleash a "Guns of August" attack on Iran, LaRouche warned.<1>

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has called for the Senate to remain in session for much of August—at least until the stalled Defense Authorization Bill is thoroughly debated and passed.

On July 27, after the Senate defeated a cloture vote which would have blocked a series of amendments to the bill, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) had indicated that he would hold the defense bill until September, a move that Reid strongly opposed.

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2005/3231cheneys_guns.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, he's nuts
The entire global economy has been weeks away from total collapse since the early 1970s, according to this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. nuts doesn't matter, wrong does
There's a lot of bullcrap coming out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am not one to armchair diagnose (OK yes I am) but
the guy obviously has schizophrenia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He's just a poor, wannabe Illuminati
They won't let him into the club, because he's a nut. Well, MORE of a nut than they are. So he pretends to be 'in the know' anyway.

However, I have suspected he's been used in some real disinfo operations, either knowingly or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idlisambar Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. nuts n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. nuts
Oh, by the way, Hitler was in a bunker and insane because his little plot to conquer the world was disintegrating around him and the soviet red army was laying siege to Berlin. I don't see the red army, or any army, laying siege to Washington any time soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. utterly, completely, totally nuts
and dead wrong, stupid and foolish to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwvining Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. OK, so...
I agree they are nuts but at the last Tom Delay "Townhall Meeting" I attended ( I live in that lowlife fuck's district) the Larouches were the only ones to show up and give him hell. I wish we had their passion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Lyndon = nuts
LaRouchites are not all nuts. he's nuts, they are a mixture of the misguided, the cointelpro agents, or the also nuts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. They're mainly just young
Exactly the right age to be really flattered to be called members of a new wave of intellectual supermen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well...we will find out if he is totally nuts in about 30 days. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't know if he's nuts, but he not the only one talking about this
There are LOTS of rumours of plans being drawn up that include tactical nuclear weapons being used in an attack on Iran, and such an attack has been talked about right here on DU.

You may not like LaRouche, but he is NOT saying anything many other people aren't saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. there have been mentions of it on CNN as well, last Thursday I believe
There is a real fear that this is about to happen largely due to Chenney's power decreasing in the nation. We will see and soon.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. CONPLAN 8022
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 10:52 PM by not systems
Well let's hope he is wrong.

http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/index.php/CONPLAN_8022

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/14/AR2005051400071.html


Not Just A Last Resort?
A Global Strike Plan, With a Nuclear Option

By William Arkin

Sunday, May 15, 2005; Page B01

Early last summer, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld approved a top secret "Interim Global Strike Alert Order" directing the military to assume and maintain readiness to attack hostile countries that are developing weapons of mass destruction, specifically Iran and North Korea.

Two months later, Lt. Gen. Bruce Carlson, commander of the 8th Air Force, told a reporter that his fleet of B-2 and B-52 bombers had changed its way of operating so that it could be ready to carry out such missions. "We're now at the point where we are essentially on alert," Carlson said in an interview with the Shreveport (La.) Times. "We have the capacity to plan and execute global strikes." Carlson said his forces were the U.S. Strategic Command's "focal point for global strike" and could execute an attack "in half a day or less."

In the secret world of military planning, global strike has become the term of art to describe a specific preemptive attack. When military officials refer to global strike, they stress its conventional elements. Surprisingly, however, global strike also includes a nuclear option, which runs counter to traditional U.S. notions about the defensive role of nuclear weapons

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. No on and no forth. Why does this man get so much respect outside of
he US? Just another gd' conspiracy, Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Domitan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. Half-lies are more effective than full lies
Larouche has too many distortions in that only very careful observers and astute political students can discern between the BS and legitimate information.

Antiwar.com is a much better site (along with certain blogs) for hard-hitting articles that have good predictive value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC