Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From the Orange Punch Blog: Defining Conservatism Down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:14 AM
Original message
From the Orange Punch Blog: Defining Conservatism Down
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 10:22 AM by question everything
(edited to add URL)

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Defining Conservatism Down

I usually get into work at 9 a.m. But today traffic snarls kept me in my flivver another 40 minutes, so I got to listen to some blab radio, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly. They exemplify what Austin Bramwell, in an incisive article in the Aug. 29 The American Conservative Magazine, calls "Defining Conservatism Down." (Not online yet, but described here http://isteve.blogspot.com/2005/07/how-right-got-bigger-dumber.html )

I enjoyed Rush during the Clinton regime because he always made fun of the nuts running the country. But under Bush he's mostly just shilled for his friend, the president. Today he just was reading Bush talking points about Judge John Roberts. For all I know, Roberts will prove a stout defender of the Constitution. But Rush didn't bring up that we don't know whether Roberts will turn out a Clarence Thomas (mostly good) or a Souter (almost all bad). And Rush didn't raise such questions as: How much of the Constitution is there left anyway after so many assaults on it, especially by the court? Will Roberts decide in favor of the Bush regime, and its successors, on unconstitutional, undeclared wars such as the war in Iraq, or will he uphold the Constitution's clear stipulation that only Congress can declare war?

Then I switched to O'Reilly, who was ranting about how Iraq will become a terrorist haven unless America pours in more U.S. troops. Has he noticed that is the war itself that made Iraq a magnet for terrorists? And why doesn't he volunteer to go over there?

O'Reilly's only 56, the age of some reservists. He at least could guard some prisoners. Here's what the Chickenhawk Database says about him: "Conflict Avoided: Vietnam. Notes: Bill O'Reilly loves to come off as a straight-talking, blue-collar kind of guy. Funny, a lot of guys who fit that description and graduated high school the same year he did - 1967 - went straight to Vietnam. Not our Bill - he went to college. And he didn’t just go to college, he spent his junior year, 1969-1970, in London. He graduated in 1971, briefly exposing him to the draft again, but Bill was miraculously spared."

I turned the radio off and listened to some classical on KUSC.

Posted by John Seiler - jseiler@ocregister.com at 12:32

http://www.ocregister.com/blog/commentary/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC