Can Democrats get smart?

[kskiska]

Rich liberals, fed up with losing, are spending big bucks to create think tanks and training programs. Their goal isn't just to beat Bush, but to remake the American political landscape.

By Michael Scherer

"Devastated" does not do it justice. The day after the last presidential election, the millionaires and billionaires who fund progressive politics awoke to find their historic efforts had fallen flat. They had thrown small fortunes and thousands of work hours into the battle to defeat President Bush, blitzed swing states with television ads, placed millions of phone calls, and recruited enough Election Day workers to fill a small city. And yet George W. Bush won in a walk, increasing his margin of victory with gains in key demographics like black and Hispanic voters. In the House and the Senate, the GOP expanded its majority.

"We kind of pulled the covers up over our heads for a while," said Deborah Rappaport, who, with her venture capitalist husband, Andrew, funded several liberal 527 groups. Several of the largest liberal groups, like America Coming Together, closed up shop, merged or downsized. Activists polished their résumé&s. The founders of MoveOn.org called themselves "heartbroken." The billionaire financier George Soros, who gave more than $25 million to the effort, admitted, "Obviously, I am distressed."

Liberal money was down for the count, but only temporarily. Now, nearly a year after their defeat at the polls, wealthy liberals are again pulling out their checkbooks.

But this time, they are looking beyond the midterm elections in 2006 or the presidential showdown in 2008. Dozens of the richest people in America have banded together to develop a new, permanent network of progressive organizations that will, they hope, fundamentally alter the political direction of the country. Their idea is to create a sort of venture capital firm for progressive philanthropy, a new organization they call the Democracy Alliance. The Alliance will do very little substantive work itself. Rather it will direct six- and seven-figure donations to those groups -- whether they are think tanks, media outlets, or training programs for young liberal leaders -- that show the most promise.

"The Democrats for a long time have been fixed on the next election or the election after that," says Peter L. Buttenweiser, an heir to the Lehman Brothers securities fortune and one of the Democratic Party's most generous donors. "This is the first concerted effort to build the infrastructure of the progressive party in a way that replicates what the right has been doing for a long time."

more…
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/08/22/alliance/index.html

[Frances]

1. Good article

Thanks for the link

I can always count on DU to let me keep up with the best articles.

[Jim Sagle]

2. Earth to rich liberals: "It's Diebold, Stupid!!!!" Will they EVER get a

fuckin' clue?????????

[DemInDistress]

3. jim...i couldn't agree more with you

if Democrats cant neutralize Diabolical Deibold then all future chances of winning another election are slim...Some friends of mine {gopers} actually believe bush outvoted kerry..never happened not in 2000 or 2004.Its a wonder stealing a few votes from thousands of precincts around key states is all one needs today to win an election..

[wli]

5. and Sequoia, and ES&S

Diebold is easier to say, but there are actually 3 major companies involved.

Also, I suspect the "liberal elites" recognize this also, but just aren't publicizing electoral fraud much, or are at least trial ballooning it or gradually introducing the notion.

[wli]

4. is there any way to give feedback?

Contributions from the "proletariat" or whatever you want to call the working class or common people or whatever, would likely pour in given their actual numerical predominance. I, for one, would contribute my part, even to the point of being "painful."