Here's my candidate for one of The Top 10 Conservative Idiots this week.

[amb123]

End the Debacle Ms. Sheehan
Steve Darnell

It is time to put an end to the “Cindy Sheehan debacle” in Crawford, Texas. Since I am not one to sugarcoat a subject I will start by simply saying: Ms. Sheehan is a liberal nut case who needs to be put in her place.

I know these are strong words to use against a “grieving mother”, but the time for grief is over. Ms. Sheehan’s own hateful words ended her grievance.

Cindy Sheehan, who returned to her camp outside Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas Thursday after going to California to care for her ailing mother, is demanding to see President Bush over the death of her son in Iraq. Her son, 24-year-old Army Specialist Casey Sheehan, was killed in Iraq last year. She has also started protesting the war in Iraq and has since become the poster child for the anti-war wackos who are calling for the complete withdrawal of troops from Iraq.

For the record, Ms. Sheehan already saw President Bush in June of last year when Bush met with families that have lost sons and daughters in Iraq. At that time Ms. Sheehan seemed to appreciate the meeting. “I now know he’s sincere about wanting freedom for the Iraqis,” Cindy said after their meeting, “I know he’s sorry and feels some pain for our loss. And I know he’s a man of faith.”

Now, apparently the grieving mother has changed her mind about President Bush, calling him the “biggest terrorist in the world”.

The Drudge Report produced transcripts of a speech Ms. Sheehan recently gave at San Francisco State University where she said, “We are not waging a war on terror in this country. We’re waging a war of terror. The biggest terrorist in the world is George W. Bush!”

She continued her anti-war tirade saying, “The whole world is damaged. Our humanity is damaged. If he thinks that it’s so important for Iraq to have a US-imposed sense of freedom and democracy, then he needs to sign up his two little party-animal girls. They need to go to this war.”

“We want our country back and, if we have to impeach everybody from George Bush down to the person who picks up... in Washington, we will impeach all those people.”

Ms. Sheehan also proved her lack of intellect stating, “We are waging a nuclear war in Iraq right now. That country is contaminated. It will be contaminated for practically eternity now.” I must admit, nuclear war is news to me. Has anyone else heard of this?

I think it is time for our gloves to come off. Many columnists around the country have “tip-toed” around the Sheehan controversy because they have respected the loss of her son. But now Ms. Sheehan is showing her true colors: Liberal activist, not loving mother. I think it is time to fight back.

Ms. Sheehan and other appeasers around the world provide the fuel that feeds the fire of terrorism. If not for this fuel, terrorists would realize that they do not have a chance to sway the minds of people and would end the bombing. Terrorists are not stupid, they understand that bombing innocent civilians will not change the minds of the strong, but will break the will of the weak. So they attack the weak and the weak fold.

Spain is a good example of this reasoning. Would the terrorists have attacked Spain if the whole population stood strong against terrorism? No. What would be the point?

Every time an appeaser voices his or her opinion against the war in Iraq terrorists gain hope that they can change the will of the people. So whether they want to admit it or not, appeasers protesting the war in Iraq are indirectly responsible for the death of the innocent. And the death of our soldiers.

In fact appeasers are directly responsible for the death of Ms. Sheehan’s son, not George W. Bush. If the whole country was united for the war in Iraq, I doubt if the terrorists would have started their suicide bombing campaign.

Using this logic Ms. Sheehan has become the biggest terrorist in the world, not George W. Bush as she so eloquently stated. And the liberal media has become her ally by spreading the word of her protest to the terrorists.

One other point: Every time Ms. Sheehan opens her mouth in protest she is dragging the legacy of her son through liberal muck. Her son was a hero who volunteered to serve his county and died protecting the constitution. Now his mother has become a traitor who is using the war on terror to wage a war against a president whom she does not like. What sense does this make?

Does Ms. Sheehan want her son to be known as the son of the liberal wacko from California sitting in a ditch in Crawford, Texas, or would she like her son to be known as a young man who died protecting the people of the United States?

She is no longer a grieving mother but has become a target in the battle against liberal activism and it is time the war was taken to the enemy.

Unfortunately her son’s good name will soon go down in history as the son of a wacko liberal instead of a war hero.

— Steve Darnell is a self-syndicated columnist and can be reached at www.stevedarnell.com

OMFG, how much hate, lies, smears and character assassination can you cram into one column!

:wow:

[Inland]

1. They once said, don't blame Bush, the terrorists killed Casey.

Now they say the "appeasers are directly responsible". DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE.

And of course, guess who's responsible for the flood of invective aimed at Cindy Sheehan? Not the person who vomits this column and calls Sheehan a "traitor". Not the person who knows Casey Sheehan not as a deceased vet, but the son of a "liberal wacko."

No, the person responsible for the hatred of Sheehan is Sheehan herself when she took on Bush. Because that's the one offense that she should have known would have brought all the lies and all the hate that these people have to offer, from all the prior examples.

She should have known that this columnist has no shame.

There's the lesson from the neocons on responsibility and morality.

[w13rd0]

2. I'm sick of pussyfooting around these clowns...

...they need to be beat down, humiliated and laughed at. As a liberal, I'm supposed to believe in the potential good of everyone, but I see no redemption, no humanity, in these filthy bastards. They've said it enough about us, it's time we recognize the enemy and treat them as such. Up against the wall with Steve Darnell.

[Maestro]

3. Hey Darnell

Here is how much I think what you say is important.



And if you don't get the message here is another visual.



It's really ironic that this guy is calling Sheehan a wacko. His words just about paint the perfect picture of a radical right wingnut who blindly supports his great leader, the almighty pretzelnut. Worthless dribble if you ask me.

[ovidsen]

4. Is this idiot column published anywhere?

I read some of his other dribblings, and I am not impressed. I mean, give me a couple of beers and Rush or Hannity can be entertaining (sometimes), but this guy not only writes lies, he writes badly. No wonder he's "self-syndicated".

[amb123]

5. I found it on "ArabNews.com"

The site bills itself as "The Middle East's Leading English Language Daily" but I think could be a Bush propaganda tool.

[ovidsen]

6. Thanks!

That paper sounds about as reliable and responsible as "The Dr**ge Report".

By the way, from one newbie to another, welcome to DU!