|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:05 AM Original message |
Alberta is about to get wildly rich and powerful (ENOUGH OIL 4US 4 50 YRS) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
1. maybe now the US will stop being asses about the wood thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. I'd be all excited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Thats because the Monopoly Oil cartel created artificial scarcity for $$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. LOL ah yet another conspiracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:25 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. From 3$ to 6$ a barrel is cheap with oil at 60$ a barrel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:30 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Oil won't be 60$ a barrel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:37 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
28. edit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 01:09 AM Response to Reply #9 |
30. That is so much bullshit!! The good baptist reverend is trying to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
3. What kind of bullshit hype IS this?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Petrodollar Warfare (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-30-05 08:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
50. EROEI for tar sands is 1.5 ...(not 3) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Extend a Hand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
4. I hope it works out that way, but I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
5. Recovering oil from bitumen expends a LOT of energy, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:20 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. True, but its a difference of 3$ per barrel to about 6$ a barrel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:21 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Saudi oil costs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Oils over 60$ a barrel my friend! 18$ is still absurdly profitable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:29 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Not to the consumer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:34 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. True, alternatives will certainly become more economical! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. My understanding is that the Chinese will benifit from this if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
7. There is alot of oil down there. But they do tend to hype it more when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
8. Double Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
10. I had read somewhere here on DU that the big Dick was visiting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
turbo_satan (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
11. I guess that means we'll have to invade and rid them of WMD now. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 04:05 AM Response to Reply #11 |
42. Hey, if you can't f**k over your friends, who can you f**k over? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 10:15 AM Response to Reply #11 |
45. Yes, they are probably hiding WMD in haystacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
13. And then the Oil exports will skew our dollar so much that all other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaPat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
16. Well, if Canada is #2 instead of Iraq, that would push you to the top of t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:31 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Doesn't require an invasion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
24. Oh, shit. Does this mean that bush will attack Canada now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:42 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Naahhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:46 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Does he know where it is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
u4ic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 02:07 AM Response to Reply #27 |
37. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 01:14 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. attacking Canada |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 01:19 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. can you even imagine the senate??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joebert (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 01:25 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I'd figure out how to enlist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brundle_Fly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 01:47 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. umm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joebert (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 02:13 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. As you know, Fox News speaks for a teeny subset of the people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
u4ic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 02:04 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. This may be good news for our province |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
26. Maybe I should invest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NVMojo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
29. sorry but these fuckers have had control over our oil and natural gas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 01:29 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Which fuckers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 02:17 AM Response to Reply #29 |
39. Woah...slow down. You must know something we don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bribri16 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
40. Maybe Buchanan and Gibson will take back their smear attacks on Canada now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ConcernedCanuk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
41. Great article and worth reading, but c'mon - LBN? > > "June 13, 2005" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 05:25 AM Response to Original message |
43. If true, Alberta's about to lose every single right they ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrin_73 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
44. Watch out Canada, youre on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
46. I dunno, I keep having this literal nightmare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ovidsen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
47. NY Times re: US-Canada-oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
48. wasn't cost effective to extract until oil prices got this high. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CHIMO (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-29-05 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
49. Before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-31-05 04:52 AM Response to Original message |
51. Ok, so Alberta can supply the US for 50 years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC