I don't know what to make of this, but here it is.
It wasn't hard to detect the glee last week when the National Enquirer published allegations that Rush Limbaugh was addicted to prescription painkillers. Al Franken, liberal un-funnyman, sneered that if the allegations were true, he was "looking forward to the perp walk." The ultra-liberal Web site DemocraticUnderground.com smirked, "Yup, if the rumors are true, Rush Limbaugh is a big fat junkie." Tony Norman, columnist for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, wrote that Limbaugh was "a mere notch or two above a low-rent crack addict."Shapiro goes on to talk about how being addicted to prescription drugs is not at all the same as being addicted to recreational drugs -->
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20031008.shtmlBut what strikes me is it seems like we (posters at "Democratic Underground" are being held up as the mean spirited side of Liberalism. I know it's a fine line between being tough and being mean spirited, and certainly I don't favor any Alan Colmes style weakness on the issues.
I guess part of the "problem" is that we are an open discussion forum; anybody can saw whatever they want largely without consequence. In those circumstances, it's easy enough for lazy writers to find something that fits what they want to say about Liberals or Democrats, while ignoring the fact that dozens of competing views are presented as well.
The day the Rush Limbaugh story broke, there were a lot of people crowing about his problems. There were others who felt some sympathy for him as a fellow human being. There were those who didn't care one way or another about him personally, but hoped this would lead to a more honest debate on the criminilization of drugs. But it's easy enough for Shapiro or anybody to pull out one argument they don't like and use it.
Anyway for further commentary on the Shapiro piece -->
http://politicalcomment.blogspot.comBryant