U.S. must learn to think the unthinkable - Storm damage shouldn't have been a surprise - Eamonn Kelly
Nearly two weeks after Hurricane Katrina ripped through the Gulf Coast, we remain haunted by the images of hungry, homeless and ill Americans in scenes of abandonment and helplessness. The word that still comes to mind is "unbelievable."
Yet, both the magnitude of the damage caused by the catastrophe and the extent to which it came as a surprise are entirely predictable. The real failure is that we still have not learned first to think the unthinkable and then believe it.
The catchphrase "thinking about the unthinkable" isn't new. It originated in 1962 with a book by that title from the pioneering futurist Herman Kahn. Kahn broke new intellectual ground when he argued that the United States needed to systematically imagine a future after the unthinkable -- nuclear war -- and then prepare for survival.
Just as we learned to think the unthinkable about nuclear war, especially after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we now need to face up to the new realities of today's challenges -- whether they're natural disasters like Katrina and the Asian tsunami or terrorist attacks like Sept. 11 and the London bombings.
But as we've learned again and again, it is painfully difficult for human beings to think this way. Cognitive bias distorts our ability to prepare for and respond to events of the magnitude that struck New Orleans. For instance, President Bush said three days after the hurricane hit, "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees," when planners, academics, government officials and journalists had been predicting that exact scenario for about four decades.